Wang Sophia S, Lacey James V
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Jan 15;183(2):92-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv236. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
In this issue of the Journal, Amirian et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(2):85-91) present a report from the Genetic Epidemiology of Glioma International Consortium (GLIOGENE Consortium), a new international consortium of glioma case-control studies. This report is noteworthy, because the GLIOGENE Consortium represents a new generation of epidemiologic consortia. GLIOGENE investigators have created an infrastructure that addresses important limitations of first-generation consortia efforts, which comprised a posteriori harmonization of exposure data and the inclusion of studies that did not include the same--or any--exposure data. As with these first-generation consortia efforts, the GLIOGENE Consortium embraces the primary importance of sample size, and to achieve that, the consortium tolerates different study designs that permit heterogeneity in case and control ascertainment. In contrast, however, the consortium's Glioma International Case-Control (GICC) Study incorporates systematic collection of exposure data from both cases and controls to facilitate downstream evaluation of exposure associations and gene-environment interactions. The described GICC Study thus serves as a model for future epidemiologic efforts that reflects a paradigm shift whereby studies are now being conducted with the expectation of downstream collaboration, thus demanding coordination and harmonization of apparently independent efforts at the time of study initiation rather than at study completion.
在本期《杂志》中,阿米里安等人(《美国流行病学杂志》。2016年;183(2):85 - 91)发表了来自胶质瘤国际遗传流行病学联盟(GLIOGENE联盟)的一份报告,该联盟是一个新的胶质瘤病例对照研究国际联盟。这份报告值得关注,因为GLIOGENE联盟代表了新一代的流行病学联盟。GLIOGENE的研究人员创建了一个基础设施,解决了第一代联盟努力中的重要局限性,第一代联盟努力包括对暴露数据进行事后协调以及纳入那些没有相同——或任何——暴露数据的研究。与这些第一代联盟的努力一样,GLIOGENE联盟认可样本量的首要重要性,并且为了实现这一点,该联盟容忍不同的研究设计,这些设计允许在病例和对照的确定方面存在异质性。然而,相比之下,该联盟的胶质瘤国际病例对照(GICC)研究纳入了对病例和对照的暴露数据进行系统收集,以促进对暴露关联和基因 - 环境相互作用的下游评估。因此,所描述的GICC研究成为未来流行病学研究的一个典范,它反映了一种范式转变,即现在开展研究时预期会有下游合作,因此要求在研究启动时而不是研究完成时对明显独立的研究工作进行协调和统一。