Prottengeier Johannes, Petzoldt Marlen, Jess Nikola, Moritz Andreas, Gall Christine, Schmidt Joachim, Breuer Georg
From the Department of Anaesthesiology (JP, MP, NJ, AM, JS, GB), and Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany (CG).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):195-203. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000315.
Dual-tasking, the need to divide attention between concurrent tasks, causes a severe increase in workload in emergency situations and yet there is no standardised training simulation scenario for this key difficulty.
We introduced and validated a quantifiable source of divided attention and investigated its effects on performance and workload in airway management.
A randomised, crossover, interventional simulation study.
Center for Training and Simulation, Department of Anaesthesiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Germany.
One hundred and fifty volunteer medical students, paramedics and anaesthesiologists of all levels of training.
Participants secured the airway of a manikin using a supraglottic airway, conventional endotracheal intubation and video-assisted endotracheal intubation with and without the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), which served as a quantifiable source of divided attention.
Primary endpoint was the time for the completion of each airway task. Secondary endpoints were the number of procedural mistakes made and the perceived workload as measured by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's task load index (NASA-TLX). This is a six-dimensional questionnaire, which assesses the perception of demands, performance and frustration with respect to a task on a scale of 0 to 100.
All 150 participants completed the tests. Volunteers perceived our test to be challenging (99%) and the experience of stress and distraction true to an emergency situation (80%), but still fair (98%) and entertaining (95%). The negative effects of divided attention were reproducible in participants of all levels of expertise. Time consumption and perceived workload increased and almost half the participants make procedural mistakes under divided attention. The supraglottic airway technique was least affected by divided attention.
The scenario was effective for simulation training involving divided attention in acute care medicine. The significant effects on performance and perceived workload demonstrate the validity of the model, which was also characterised by high acceptability, technical simplicity and a novel degree of standardisation.
一心多用,即在同时进行的任务之间分配注意力的需求,会导致紧急情况下工作量急剧增加,但针对这一关键难题尚无标准化的培训模拟场景。
我们引入并验证了一种可量化的注意力分散源,并研究了其对气道管理中操作表现和工作量的影响。
一项随机、交叉、干预性模拟研究。
德国埃尔朗根大学医院麻醉科培训与模拟中心。
150名志愿者医学生、护理人员以及各级别的麻醉医生。
参与者使用声门上气道、传统气管插管以及视频辅助气管插管为模拟人建立气道,同时伴有或不伴有听觉连续加法测试(PASAT),该测试作为一种可量化的注意力分散源。
主要终点是完成每项气道任务的时间。次要终点是操作失误的数量以及由美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)测量的主观工作量。这是一份六维问卷,在0至100的量表上评估对一项任务的需求、表现和挫折感。
所有150名参与者均完成了测试。志愿者们认为我们的测试具有挑战性(99%),压力和分心体验与紧急情况相符(80%),但仍然公平(98%)且有趣(95%)。注意力分散的负面影响在各级专业水平的参与者中均可重现。时间消耗和主观工作量增加,近一半的参与者在注意力分散的情况下出现操作失误。声门上气道技术受注意力分散的影响最小。
该场景对于急性护理医学中涉及注意力分散的模拟培训有效。对操作表现和主观工作量的显著影响证明了该模型的有效性,其还具有高可接受性、技术简单性和新颖的标准化程度。