Tauber Mark, Valler Dennis, Lichtenberg Sven, Magosch Petra, Moroder Philipp, Habermeyer Peter
Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, ATOS Clinic Munich, Munich, Germany Department of Traumatology and Sports Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, ATOS Clinic Munich, Munich, Germany.
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):482-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546515615583. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
Arthroscopically assisted single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction using autologous tendon grafts has been reported to provide acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) stability in chronic instability cases. Recently, additional AC ligament reconstruction to provide triple-bundle (TB) stabilization has been introduced but lacks a comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes.
Arthroscopically assisted anatomic TB CC and AC reconstruction yields superior clinical and radiological results when compared with nonanatomic SB CC reconstruction.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Twenty-six patients (mean [±SD] age, 46.9 ± 12.8 years) suffering from chronic high-grade ACJ instability underwent ACJ stabilization using autologous hamstring grafts. Twelve patients underwent combined anatomic TB CC and AC reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon with clavicular interference screw fixation (TB group), and 14 underwent isolated SB CC reconstruction using the AC GraftRope system with a gracilis tendon (SB group). After a minimum follow-up of 2 years (mean, 29.0 ± 7.4 months), patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically using the Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Taft, and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score (ACJI) outcome measures.
The mean Constant score increased significantly in both groups, from 71.6 preoperatively to 88.8 postoperatively in the TB group and from 67.8 to 82.6 in the SB group (P ≤ .009). No intergroup difference was found regarding the final Constant or ASES scores. Regarding the ACJ-specific scores, the final outcomes were significantly different: 10.9 (TB group) versus 9.0 (SB group) for the mean Taft score (P = .018) and 84.7 versus 58.4, respectively, for the mean ACJI score (P = .0001). No significant radiological difference was found regarding the mean CC distance (10.7 mm [TB group] vs 13.1 mm [SB group]). The TB group showed superior horizontal ACJ stability (P = .011), which was associated with a better clinical outcome according to the ACJI and Taft scores. In the SB group, the rate of ACJ instability recurrence was higher (21% vs 8% [TB group]).
Combined arthroscopically assisted anatomic TB CC and AC ligament reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus tendon graft provides superior clinical and radiological results compared with isolated nonanatomic SB CC ligament reconstruction using the AC GraftRope system. In particular, the TB technique can better restore horizontal ACJ stability, which is associated with superior ACJ-specific outcome scores.
据报道,在慢性不稳定病例中,使用自体肌腱移植进行关节镜辅助下单束(SB)或双束喙锁(CC)韧带重建可提供肩锁(AC)关节(ACJ)稳定性。最近,已引入额外的AC韧带重建以提供三束(TB)稳定,但缺乏临床和影像学结果的比较。
与非解剖学SB CC重建相比,关节镜辅助下解剖学TB CC和AC重建产生更好的临床和影像学结果。
队列研究;证据等级,2。
26例(平均[±标准差]年龄,46.9±12.8岁)患有慢性高度ACJ不稳定的患者使用自体绳肌腱进行ACJ稳定手术。12例患者使用半腱肌腱联合锁骨干涉螺钉固定进行解剖学TB CC和AC联合重建(TB组),14例患者使用AC GraftRope系统和股薄肌腱进行单纯SB CC重建(SB组)。在至少2年的随访(平均,29.0±7.4个月)后,使用Constant、美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)、Taft和肩锁关节不稳定评分(ACJI)结果指标对患者进行影像学和临床评估。
两组的平均Constant评分均显著提高,TB组从术前的71.6提高到术后的88.8,SB组从67.8提高到82.6(P≤0.009)。最终的Constant或ASES评分未发现组间差异。关于ACJ特异性评分,最终结果有显著差异:平均Taft评分为10.9(TB组)对9.0(SB组)(P = 0.018),平均ACJI评分为84.7对58.4(P = 0.0001)。平均CC距离未发现显著的影像学差异(10.7 mm[TB组]对13.1 mm[SB组])。TB组显示出更好的ACJ水平稳定性(P = 0.011),根据ACJI和Taft评分,这与更好的临床结果相关。在SB组中,ACJ不稳定复发率更高(21%对8%[TB组])。
与使用AC GraftRope系统进行单纯非解剖学SB CC韧带重建相比,使用自体半腱肌腱移植进行关节镜辅助下解剖学TB CC和AC韧带联合重建可提供更好的临床和影像学结果。特别是,TB技术可以更好地恢复ACJ水平稳定性,这与更好的ACJ特异性结果评分相关。