Grall-Bronnec Marie, Sauvaget Anne, Perrouin Fanny, Leboucher Juliette, Etcheverrigaray François, Challet-Bouju Gaëlle, Gaboriau Louise, Derkinderen Pascal, Jolliet Pascale, Victorri-Vigneau Caroline
From the *Clinical Investigation Unit, "Behavioral Addictions/Complex Affective Disorders," Department of Addictology and Psychiatry, CHU Nantes; †EA 4275 "Biostatistics, Pharmacoepidemiology, and Subjective Measures in Health Sciences," Université Nantes; Departments of ‡Pharmacology, and §Neurology, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;36(1):63-70. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000444.
In the last 10 years, dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) has become a well-known risk factor for developing an impulse control disorder, such as gambling disorder (GD). Another medication, aripiprazole (ARI), has been more recently identified as another risk factor. Dopamine replacement therapy and ARI share a dopamine agonist action. Our work aimed at comparing patients with PG according to their treatment with DRT or ARI.
Two methods were combined-a systematic review concentrated on case reports and the analysis of a French disordered gamblers cohort focused on patients using ARI or DRT at inclusion.
We reported 48 cases of GD possibly due to DRT and 17 cases of GD possibly due to ARI. Because of their standardized assessment, only the EVALJEU patients could be compared. Two clinical patterns emerged. Patients in the ARI group were young, impulsive, and high novelty seekers and had a history of substance misuse. Their first gambling experience occurred during adolescence. Conversely, patients in the DRT group were old, and they began gambling late in life. They showed low levels of gambling-related cognition.
Patients in the ARI group seemed to be more severe pathological gamblers than patients in the DRT group. Aripiprazole is a partial D2 receptor agonist, whereas DRT includes full D2 receptor agonist. The trigger mechanism of PG development is complex and cannot only be attributed only to the pharmacodynamic effects of dopaminergic drugs. Indeed, individual vulnerability factors and environmental factors need to be considered.
在过去10年中,多巴胺替代疗法(DRT)已成为引发冲动控制障碍(如赌博障碍,GD)的一个众所周知的风险因素。另一种药物阿立哌唑(ARI)最近也被确定为另一个风险因素。多巴胺替代疗法和阿立哌唑具有多巴胺激动剂作用。我们的研究旨在根据接受DRT或ARI治疗的情况比较帕金森病(PG)患者。
结合了两种方法——专注于病例报告的系统综述以及对一个法国无序赌博者队列的分析,该队列重点关注纳入时使用ARI或DRT的患者。
我们报告了48例可能由DRT导致的GD病例和17例可能由ARI导致的GD病例。由于评估标准化,只有EVALJEU患者可以进行比较。出现了两种临床模式。ARI组的患者年轻、冲动、追求新奇,并有物质滥用史。他们的首次赌博经历发生在青春期。相反,DRT组的患者年龄较大,且他们在晚年才开始赌博。他们的赌博相关认知水平较低。
ARI组的患者似乎比DRT组的患者是更严重的病态赌博者。阿立哌唑是一种D2受体部分激动剂,而DRT包括D2受体完全激动剂。PG发展的触发机制很复杂,不能仅归因于多巴胺能药物的药效学作用。事实上,个体易感性因素和环境因素也需要考虑。