Grimwade David, Ivey Adam, Huntly Brian J P
Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom;
Department of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research and Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, and Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Blood. 2016 Jan 7;127(1):29-41. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-604496. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
Recent major advances in understanding the molecular basis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) provide a double-edged sword. Although defining the topology and key features of the molecular landscape are fundamental to development of novel treatment approaches and provide opportunities for greater individualization of therapy, confirmation of the genetic complexity presents a huge challenge to successful translation into routine clinical practice. It is now clear that many genes are recurrently mutated in AML; moreover, individual leukemias harbor multiple mutations and are potentially composed of subclones with differing mutational composition, rendering each patient's AML genetically unique. In order to make sense of the overwhelming mutational data and capitalize on this clinically, it is important to identify (1) critical AML-defining molecular abnormalities that distinguish biological disease entities; (2) mutations, typically arising in subclones, that may influence prognosis but are unlikely to be ideal therapeutic targets; (3) mutations associated with preleukemic clones; and (4) mutations that have been robustly shown to confer independent prognostic information or are therapeutically relevant. The reward of identifying AML-defining molecular lesions present in all leukemic populations (including subclones) has been exemplified by acute promyelocytic leukemia, where successful targeting of the underlying PML-RARα oncoprotein has eliminated the need for chemotherapy for disease cure. Despite the molecular heterogeneity and recognizing that treatment options for other forms of AML are limited, this review will consider the scope for using novel molecular information to improve diagnosis, identify subsets of patients eligible for targeted therapies, refine outcome prediction, and track treatment response.
近期在理解急性髓系白血病(AML)分子基础方面取得的重大进展是一把双刃剑。虽然确定分子格局的拓扑结构和关键特征对于开发新的治疗方法至关重要,并为实现更个体化的治疗提供了机会,但确认基因复杂性对成功转化为常规临床实践构成了巨大挑战。现在很清楚,许多基因在AML中反复发生突变;此外,个体白血病存在多个突变,并且可能由具有不同突变组成的亚克隆构成,使得每个患者的AML在基因上都是独特的。为了理解大量的突变数据并在临床上加以利用,识别以下几点很重要:(1)区分生物学疾病实体的关键AML定义分子异常;(2)通常出现在亚克隆中的、可能影响预后但不太可能成为理想治疗靶点的突变;(3)与白血病前期克隆相关的突变;(4)已被有力证明可提供独立预后信息或与治疗相关的突变。急性早幼粒细胞白血病例证了识别所有白血病群体(包括亚克隆)中存在的AML定义分子病变的意义,在这种疾病中,成功靶向潜在的PML-RARα癌蛋白已消除了治愈疾病所需的化疗。尽管存在分子异质性,并且认识到其他形式AML的治疗选择有限,但本综述将探讨利用新的分子信息改善诊断、识别适合靶向治疗的患者亚组、完善预后预测以及跟踪治疗反应的可能性。