Iwamoto Masami, Nakahira Yuko
Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc.
Stapp Car Crash J. 2015 Nov;59:53-90. doi: 10.4271/2015-22-0003.
Accurate prediction of occupant head kinematics is critical for better understanding of head/face injury mechanisms in side impacts, especially far-side occupants. In light of the fact that researchers have demonstrated that muscle activations, especially in neck muscles, can affect occupant head kinematics, a human body finite element (FE) model that considers muscle activation is useful for predicting occupant head kinematics in real-world automotive accidents. In this study, we developed a human body FE model called the THUMS (Total HUman Model for Safety) Version 5 that contains 262 one-dimensional (1D) Hill-type muscle models over the entire body. The THUMS was validated against 36 series of PMHS (Post Mortem Human Surrogate) and volunteer test data in this study, and 16 series of PMHS and volunteer test data on side impacts are presented. Validation results with force-time curves were also evaluated quantitatively using the CORA (CORrelation and Analysis) method. The validation results suggest that the THUMS has good biofidelity in the responses of the regional or full body for side impacts, but relatively poor biofidelity in its local level of responses such as brain displacements. Occupant kinematics predicted by the THUMS with a muscle controller using 22 PID (Proportional-Integral- Derivative) controllers were compared with those of volunteer test data on low-speed lateral impacts. The THUMS with muscle controller reproduced the head kinematics of the volunteer data more accurately than that without muscle activation, although further studies on validation of torso kinematics are needed for more accurate predictions of occupant head kinematics.
准确预测乘员头部运动学对于更好地理解侧面碰撞中头部/面部损伤机制至关重要,尤其是对于远侧乘员。鉴于研究人员已经证明肌肉激活,特别是颈部肌肉的激活,会影响乘员头部运动学,一个考虑肌肉激活的人体有限元(FE)模型对于预测现实世界汽车事故中的乘员头部运动学很有用。在本研究中,我们开发了一个名为THUMS(Total HUman Model for Safety)版本5的人体有限元模型,该模型在全身包含262个一维(1D)希尔型肌肉模型。在本研究中,THUMS针对36组PMHS(尸体人类替代物)和志愿者测试数据进行了验证,并给出了16组侧面碰撞的PMHS和志愿者测试数据。还使用CORA(相关性和分析)方法对力-时间曲线的验证结果进行了定量评估。验证结果表明,THUMS在侧面碰撞的区域或全身响应中具有良好的生物逼真度,但在其局部响应水平(如脑位移)方面生物逼真度相对较差。将使用22个PID(比例-积分-微分)控制器的肌肉控制器THUMS预测的乘员运动学与低速横向碰撞志愿者测试数据的乘员运动学进行了比较。带有肌肉控制器的THUMS比没有肌肉激活的THUMS更准确地再现了志愿者数据中的头部运动学,尽管需要进一步研究躯干运动学的验证以更准确地预测乘员头部运动学。