Balaban D V, Popp A, Vasilescu F, Haidautu D, Purcarea R M, Jinga M
"Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania ; "Alfred Rusescu" Institute for Mother and Child Care, Bucharest, Romania ; Tampere Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
J Med Life. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):452-7.
In the setting of open access endoscopy, the recognition of suggestive endoscopic features in the duodenum can select patients with probability of celiac disease (CD). This could add to the current efforts to increase the diagnostic rate of this disease.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these markers for CD in an adult population undergoing endoscopy, without a prior serological testing.
Over a period of 3 years, between June 2012 and 2015, all the patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and presented one or more of the endoscopic markers consistent with CD, or those suspected for CD, irrespective of the presence of these markers, were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for these markers in CD diagnosis. Among the 182 patients, 56.04% were females, with a mean age of 47.6 ± 13.9 years. 20/182 (10.99%) had a final diagnosis of CD. The presence of any endoscopic marker had a high sensitivity (95%) and a negative predictive value (98.41%). Bulb atrophy and reduced folds in the descending duodenum had a low diagnostic accuracy, while scalloping, mosaic pattern and fissures were highly specific for CD (98.77%, 99.38% and 98.77%) and their presence greatly increased the probability of CD, with a positive likelihood ratio of 24.3, 24.3 and 12.15, respectively.
A wide set of endoscopic markers, including the duodenal bulb, were evaluated in this study. Our results showed that the endoscopy with a careful examination of the duodenum is a sensitive indicator for CD.
CD = celiac disease, GI = gastrointestinal, VA = villous atrophy, NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, Sn = sensitivity, Sp = specificity, PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, AUC = area under the curve, ROC = receiver operating characteristics, WLE = white light endoscopy, NBI = narrow band imaging, tTG = tissue transglutaminase, EMA = anti-endomysial antibodies.
在开放获取内镜检查的背景下,识别十二指肠中提示性的内镜特征可以筛选出患有乳糜泻(CD)可能性的患者。这可能有助于当前提高该疾病诊断率的努力。
本研究的目的是评估这些标志物对接受内镜检查且未进行过血清学检测的成年人群中CD的诊断准确性。
在2012年6月至2015年的3年期间,纳入了所有接受上消化道内镜检查且呈现一种或多种与CD一致的内镜标志物的患者,或那些疑似患有CD的患者,无论是否存在这些标志物。计算了这些标志物在CD诊断中的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。在182例患者中,56.04%为女性,平均年龄为47.6±13.9岁。20/182(10.99%)最终诊断为CD。任何内镜标志物的存在都具有高敏感性(95%)和阴性预测值(98.41%)。十二指肠球部萎缩和降部十二指肠皱襞减少的诊断准确性较低,而扇贝样改变、马赛克图案和裂隙对CD具有高度特异性(分别为98.77%、99.38%和98.77%),它们的存在大大增加了CD的可能性,阳性似然比分别为24.3、24.3和12.15。
本研究评估了包括十二指肠球部在内的一系列内镜标志物。我们的结果表明,仔细检查十二指肠的内镜检查是CD的敏感指标。
CD = 乳糜泻,GI = 胃肠道,VA = 绒毛萎缩,NSAID = 非甾体抗炎药,Sn = 敏感性,Sp = 特异性,PPV = 阳性预测值,NPV = 阴性预测值,AUC = 曲线下面积,ROC = 受试者工作特征,WLE = 白光内镜检查,NBI = 窄带成像,tTG = 组织转谷氨酰胺酶,EMA = 抗肌内膜抗体