Suppr超能文献

对促进初级保健干预措施的接受度:医生优先考虑什么?

Acceptance of interventions to promote primary care: What do physicians prioritize?

作者信息

Tandjung Ryan, Djalali Sima, Hasler Susann, Scherz Nathalie, Rosemann Thomas, Markun Stefan

机构信息

Institute of Primary Care, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Dec 15;16:178. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0397-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Switzerland is facing a shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs); government organizations therefore suggested a broad variety of interventions to promote primary care. The aim of the study was to prioritize these interventions according to the acceptance and perceived barriers of most relevant groups of physicians in this context (hospital physicians and PCPs).

METHODS

The study was conducted during summer 2014. An online-based questionnaire assessed demographic data, working conditions and future plans. Participants were asked to rank the usefulness of 22 interventions to promote primary care. Interventions to promote primary care that received ratings of 4 or 5 on the Likert scale (corresponding to "useful" or "very useful") by at least 80 % of the participants were categorized as interventions with very high acceptance. We analyzed whether the groups (PCPs, hospital physicians) ranked the interventions differently using the Mann-Whitney U test. We assumed a two tailed p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty physicians (response rate 58.4 %) completed the survey. Among those 69 PCPs and 66 hospital physicians were included in the analysis. Among those 14 PCPs were planning to leave clinical practice due to retirement, whereas only 8 hospital physicians planned a career as PCPs. Among PCPs the intervention with the highest acceptance was the increase of reimbursement, whereas family friendly measures achieved highest acceptance among hospital physicians. Financial support for primary care traineeships was considered to be very useful by both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions on PCPs close to retirement or on PCPs considering an early retirement will not adequately prevent shortage of primary care providers. Governmental interventions should therefore also aim at encouraging hospital physicians to start a career in primary care by governmental support for traineeships in primary care and investments in family friendly measures.

摘要

背景

瑞士正面临初级保健医生短缺的问题;因此,政府组织提出了各种各样的干预措施来促进初级保健。本研究的目的是根据在这种情况下最相关的医生群体(医院医生和初级保健医生)的接受程度和感知到的障碍,对这些干预措施进行优先级排序。

方法

该研究于2014年夏季进行。一份基于网络的问卷评估了人口统计学数据、工作条件和未来计划。参与者被要求对22项促进初级保健的干预措施的有用性进行排序。至少80%的参与者在李克特量表上对促进初级保健的干预措施给出4分或5分(对应于“有用”或“非常有用”)的评级,这些干预措施被归类为接受程度非常高的干预措施。我们使用曼-惠特尼U检验分析了两组(初级保健医生、医院医生)对干预措施的排序是否不同。在进行多重检验的邦费罗尼校正后,我们假设双侧p < 0.05具有统计学意义。

结果

230名医生(回复率58.4%)完成了调查。其中69名初级保健医生和66名医院医生被纳入分析。其中14名初级保健医生计划因退休而离开临床实践,而只有8名医院医生计划从事初级保健医生职业。在初级保健医生中,接受程度最高的干预措施是提高报销额度,而家庭友好措施在医院医生中获得了最高接受度。两组都认为对初级保健实习的财政支持非常有用。

结论

针对接近退休的初级保健医生或考虑提前退休的初级保健医生的干预措施,将不足以充分防止初级保健提供者短缺。因此,政府干预还应旨在通过政府对初级保健实习的支持和对家庭友好措施的投资,鼓励医院医生开始从事初级保健工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a4f/4678628/4e14180dafff/12875_2015_397_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验