Suppr超能文献

雾化两性霉素治疗变应性支气管肺曲霉病患者的一项前瞻性随机试验。

A pilot randomized trial of nebulized amphotericin in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

作者信息

Ram Babu, Aggarwal Ashutosh N, Dhooria Sahajal, Sehgal Inderpaul Singh, Garg Mandeep, Behera Digambar, Chakrabarti Arunaloke, Agarwal Ritesh

机构信息

a Department of Pulmonary Medicine , Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) , Chandigarh , India .

b Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging , Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) , Chandigarh , India , and.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2016 Jun;53(5):517-24. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1127935. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Nebulized amphotericin B (NAB) has been used in the management of acute stage and exacerbations of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). Whether NAB can prevent exacerbations of ABPA is not known. Herein, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAB in subjects with ABPA complicating asthma.

METHODS

Consecutive subjects of ABPA with recurrent exacerbations were randomized to receive either NAB plus nebulized budesonide (NEB) or NEB alone. The primary outcome was the time-to-first exacerbation of ABPA. The secondary outcomes were the number of subjects with ABPA exacerbations, ACQ7 scores, lung function, IgE levels, and adverse effects of treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-one subjects (14 men; mean age, 32.3 years) were randomized to either the NAB (n = 12) or the NEB (n = 9) arm. The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The time-to-first exacerbation was similar in the two groups. At one year, the numbers of patients experiencing exacerbation was significantly lower in the NAB arm (1/12 [8.3%] vs. 6/9 [66.7%]; p = 0.016). The other secondary end points were not different between the two groups. There were no major adverse events leading to discontinuation of any of the study drugs. Three patients experienced bronchospasm after first dose of NAB; however, the subsequent doses were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

NAB seems to be beneficial in decreasing the frequency of exacerbations in patients with ABPA complicating asthma. Larger trials are required to confirm our study results.

摘要

背景与目的

雾化两性霉素B(NAB)已用于治疗变应性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)的急性期和病情加重期。NAB能否预防ABPA病情加重尚不清楚。在此,我们评估NAB在合并哮喘的ABPA患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

将连续的反复病情加重的ABPA患者随机分为接受NAB加雾化布地奈德(NEB)组或单纯NEB组。主要结局是ABPA首次病情加重的时间。次要结局包括发生ABPA病情加重的患者数量、ACQ7评分、肺功能、IgE水平及治疗不良反应。

结果

21例患者(14例男性;平均年龄32.3岁)被随机分为NAB组(n = 12)或NEB组(n = 9)。两组基线特征相似。两组首次病情加重的时间相似。1年后,NAB组病情加重的患者数量显著更低(1/12 [8.3%] 对比6/9 [66.7%];p = 0.016)。两组间其他次要终点无差异。没有导致停用任何研究药物的重大不良事件。3例患者在首次使用NAB后出现支气管痉挛;然而,后续剂量耐受性良好。

结论

NAB似乎有助于降低合并哮喘的ABPA患者的病情加重频率。需要更大规模的试验来证实我们的研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验