Suppr超能文献

采用快速灵敏的ELISA D-二聚体检测及加压超声检查对1330例疑似深静脉血栓形成的门诊患者进行深静脉血栓的安全排除

Safe Exclusion of Deep Vein Thrombosis by a Rapid Sensitive ELISA D-dimer and Compression Ultrasonography in 1330 Outpatients With Suspected DVT.

作者信息

Michiels Jan Jacques, Maasland Hanny, Moossdorff Wim, Lao Mildred, Gadiseur Alain, Schroyens Wilfried

机构信息

Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Belgium STAR-Medical Diagnostic Center, Primary Care Medicine, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Goodheart Institute& Foundation in Nature Medicine & Health, Blood Coagulation and Vascular Medicine Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Belgium STAR-Medical Diagnostic Center, Primary Care Medicine, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Angiology. 2016 Sep;67(8):781-7. doi: 10.1177/0003319715616007. Epub 2015 Dec 13.

Abstract

Of 1330 outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a normal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) d-dimer (VIDAS) of <500 ng/mL was true negative in 382 of 384 and false negative in compression ultrasonography (CUS) in 2, indicating a sensitivity of 99.52% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.48%, with a specificity of 36% irrespective of clinical score. In 1059 outpatients with no DVT, the CUS was positive for the alternative diagnoses (AD): Bakers cyst, muscle hematoma, or old DVT in 62 (5.8%); superficial vein thrombosis without DVT in 78 (7.4%), and leg edema or varices in 17%. A second CUS in 641 patients was positive in 26 (4.0%), indicating an NPV of 96% after a first negative CUS. The NPV of the combination of a negative first CUS and a ELISA d-dimer test <1000 ng/mL was 99.1% at a specificity of 66.9%. As this strategy is cost effective by reduction in the need to repeat CUS by 67%, we designed a novel algorithm for the safe exclusion and diagnosis of DVT and AD for subsequent evaluation in a large prospective study.

摘要

在1330例疑似深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的门诊患者中,酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)D-二聚体(VIDAS)<500 ng/mL且结果正常的情况,在384例中有382例超声压迫检查(CUS)结果为真阴性,2例为假阴性,表明敏感性为99.52%,阴性预测值(NPV)为99.48%,无论临床评分如何,特异性为36%。在1059例无DVT的门诊患者中,CUS对其他诊断(AD)呈阳性:贝克囊肿、肌肉血肿或陈旧性DVT 62例(5.8%);无DVT的浅静脉血栓形成78例(7.4%),腿部水肿或静脉曲张17%。641例患者进行的第二次CUS检查中有26例(4.0%)呈阳性,表明首次CUS检查为阴性后的NPV为96%。首次CUS检查为阴性且ELISA D-二聚体检测<1000 ng/mL的联合检测NPV为99.1%,特异性为66.9%。由于该策略通过减少67%重复CUS检查的需求而具有成本效益,我们设计了一种新的算法用于安全排除和诊断DVT及AD,以便在一项大型前瞻性研究中进行后续评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验