Alenabi Talia, Dal Maso Fabien, Tétreault Patrice, Begon Mickaël
Laboratoire de simulation et de modélisation du mouvement (S2M), Département de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, Laval, Canada.
Laboratoire de simulation et de modélisation du mouvement (S2M), Département de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, Laval, Canada; Centre de Réadaptation Marie-Enfant-Centre Hospitalier d'Université Sainte Justine, Montréal, Canada.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Feb;32:194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
Arm elevations in different planes are commonly assessed in clinics and are included in rehabilitation protocols for patients with rotator cuff pathology. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of plane and angle of elevation on shoulder muscles activity in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tear to be used for rehabilitation purposes.
Eight symptomatic patients with rotator cuff tears were assessed by using EMG (11 surface and 2 fine wire electrodes) synchronized with a motion analysis. The subjects completed five elevations in full can position (arm externally rotated and thumb up) in frontal, scapular and sagittal planes. Muscle activity in three elevation arcs of 20° (from 0° to 60°) was presented as the percentage of mean activity. Data were analyzed by mixed linear models (α=0.003), and Tuckey Post-hoc comparisons for significant effects (α=0.05).
The effect of plane was significant for supraspinatus, middle trapezius, anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid, triceps, and pectoralis major (P<0.001). Supraspinatus was more active during abduction than scaption and flexion (P<0.05), and its activity did not increase significantly after 40° of elevation (P>0.05). Infraspinatus had similar activity pattern in the three planes of elevation (P>0.003) with increasing trend in accordance with the elevation angle.
In any rehabilitation protocol, if less activity of supraspinatus is desired, active arm elevation should be directed toward flexion and scaption and postponed abduction to prevent high level of activity in this muscle.
在临床中,不同平面的手臂抬高是常用的评估方法,并且被纳入了肩袖病变患者的康复方案中。本研究的目的是量化抬高平面和角度对有症状肩袖撕裂患者肩部肌肉活动的影响,以便用于康复目的。
使用肌电图(11个表面电极和2个细丝电极)与运动分析同步,对8例有症状的肩袖撕裂患者进行评估。受试者在额状面、肩胛面和矢状面完成五次全罐位抬高(手臂外旋且拇指向上)。三个20°抬高弧(从0°到60°)内的肌肉活动以平均活动百分比表示。数据通过混合线性模型进行分析(α=0.003),并对显著效应进行Tuckey事后比较(α=0.05)。
平面效应在上斜方肌、冈上肌、前、中、后三角肌、肱三头肌和胸大肌方面具有显著性(P<0.001)。冈上肌在外展时比在肩胛平面内收和屈曲时更活跃(P<0.05),并且在抬高40°后其活动没有显著增加(P>0.05)。冈下肌在三个抬高平面中的活动模式相似(P>0.003),且随着抬高角度增加呈上升趋势。
在任何康复方案中,如果希望减少冈上肌的活动,主动手臂抬高应指向屈曲和肩胛平面内收,并推迟外展,以防止该肌肉出现高水平活动。