Suppr超能文献

心理困扰与前往肩部诊所就诊的患者中更高的感知残疾和疼痛相关。

Psychological Distress Is Associated with Greater Perceived Disability and Pain in Patients Presenting to a Shoulder Clinic.

作者信息

Menendez Mariano E, Baker Dustin K, Oladeji Lasun O, Fryberger Charles T, McGwin Gerald, Ponce Brent A

机构信息

Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1313 13th Street South, Suite 203, Birmingham, AL 35205. E-mail address for B. Ponce:

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 16;97(24):1999-2003. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00387.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shoulder disorders are a common cause of disability and pain. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a frequently employed and previously validated measure of shoulder pain and disability. Although the SPADI has high reliability and construct validity, greater differences between individual patients are often observed than would be expected on the basis of diagnosis and pathophysiology alone. This study aims to determine how psychological factors (namely depression, catastrophic thinking, and self-efficacy) affect pain and perceived disability in the shoulder.

METHODS

A cohort of 139 patients completed a sociodemographic survey and elements from the SPADI, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-2). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association of psychosocial factors, demographic characteristics, and specific diagnosis with shoulder pain and disability.

RESULTS

The SPADI score showed medium correlation with the PCS (r = 0.43; p < 0.001), PHQ-2 (r = 0.39; p < 0.001), and PSEQ (r = -0.45; p < 0.001). Current work status (F = 4.35; p = 0.006) and body mass index (r = 0.27; p = 0.002) were also associated with the SPADI score. In the multivariate analysis, greater catastrophic thinking (estimate, 0.003; p = 0.029), lower self-efficacy (estimate, -0.005; p = 0.001), higher body mass index (estimate, 0.006; p = 0.048), and being disabled (estimate, 0.15; p = 0.017) or retired (estimate, 0.16; p < 0.001) compared with being employed were associated with worse SPADI scores. The primary diagnosis did not have a significant relationship (p > 0.05) with the SPADI.

CONCLUSIONS

Catastrophic thinking and decreased self-efficacy are associated with greater shoulder pain and disability. Our data support the notion that patient-to-patient variation in symptom intensity and magnitude of disability is more strongly related to psychological distress than to the specific shoulder diagnosis.

摘要

背景

肩部疾病是导致残疾和疼痛的常见原因。肩痛与残疾指数(SPADI)是一种常用且先前已得到验证的衡量肩痛和残疾程度的指标。尽管SPADI具有较高的可靠性和结构效度,但通常观察到个体患者之间的差异比仅基于诊断和病理生理学预期的差异更大。本研究旨在确定心理因素(即抑郁、灾难化思维和自我效能感)如何影响肩部疼痛和感知到的残疾程度。

方法

139名患者组成的队列完成了一项社会人口学调查以及SPADI、疼痛自我效能感问卷(PSEQ)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ - 2)中的项目。进行了双变量和多变量分析,以确定心理社会因素、人口统计学特征和具体诊断与肩部疼痛和残疾之间是否存在关联。

结果

SPADI评分与PCS(r = 0.43;p < 0.001)、PHQ - 2(r = 0.39;p < 0.001)和PSEQ(r = -0.45;p < 0.001)呈中度相关。当前工作状态(F = 4.35;p = 0.006)和体重指数(r = 0.27;p = 0.002)也与SPADI评分相关。在多变量分析中,与在职相比,更强的灾难化思维(估计值,0.003;p = 0.029)、更低的自我效能感(估计值,-0.005;p = 0.001)、更高的体重指数(估计值,0.006;p = 0.048)以及残疾(估计值,0.15;p = 0.017)或退休(估计值,0.16;p < 0.001)与更差的SPADI评分相关。主要诊断与SPADI无显著关系(p > 0.05)。

结论

灾难化思维和自我效能感降低与更严重的肩部疼痛和残疾相关。我们的数据支持这样一种观点,即患者之间症状强度和残疾程度的差异与心理困扰的关系比与具体的肩部诊断的关系更为密切。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验