• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项随机、双盲的2期研究,旨在评估接受德拉氟沙星、利奈唑胺或万古霉素治疗的急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者的主观和客观结果。

A randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate subjective and objective outcomes in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections treated with delafloxacin, linezolid or vancomycin.

作者信息

Kingsley Jeff, Mehra Purvi, Lawrence Laura E, Henry Eugenia, Duffy Erin, Cammarata Sue K, Pullman John

机构信息

Columbus Regional Research Institute, 800 Talbotton Road, Columbus, GA 31904, USA.

Artemis Institute for Clinical Research, 770 Washington St., San Diego, CA 92103, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Mar;71(3):821-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv411. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkv411
PMID:26679243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4743703/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Delafloxacin is an investigational anionic fluoroquinolone being developed to treat infections caused by Gram-positive and -negative organisms. This clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of delafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs).

METHODS

In a double-blind, Phase 2 trial, 256 patients were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to 300 mg of delafloxacin, 600 mg of linezolid or 15 mg/kg vancomycin (actual body weight), each administered intravenously twice daily for 5-14 days. Randomization was stratified by infection category. The primary endpoint was the investigator's assessment of cure, defined as complete resolution of baseline signs and symptoms at follow-up. Secondary endpoints included reductions in the total areas of erythema and induration and assessments of bacterial eradication. This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT01283581.

RESULTS

Cure rates were significantly greater with delafloxacin versus vancomycin (mean difference: -16.3%; 95% CI, -30.3% to -2.3%; P = 0.031); differences were significant for obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2); mean difference: -30.0%; 95% CI, -50.7% to -9.3%; P = 0.009), but not for non-obese patients. Cure rates with delafloxacin and linezolid were similar. Using digital measurement, the percentage decrease in total erythema area was significantly greater with delafloxacin versus vancomycin at follow-up (-96.4% versus -84.5%; P = 0.028). There were no differences in bacterial eradication among the treatment groups. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that delafloxacin is effective in the treatment of ABSSSIs and is well tolerated.

摘要

目的

德拉氟沙星是一种正在研发的阴离子氟喹诺酮类药物,用于治疗革兰氏阳性和阴性菌引起的感染。本临床试验评估了德拉氟沙星治疗急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项双盲2期试验中,256例患者按1∶1∶1随机分为三组,分别接受300mg德拉氟沙星、600mg利奈唑胺或15mg/kg万古霉素(实际体重)治疗,均静脉注射,每日2次,疗程5 - 14天。随机分组按感染类别进行分层。主要终点为研究者对治愈情况的评估,定义为随访时基线体征和症状完全消失。次要终点包括红斑和硬结总面积的缩小以及细菌清除情况的评估。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01283581。

结果

德拉氟沙星组的治愈率显著高于万古霉素组(平均差异:-16.3%;95%CI,-30.3%至-2.3%;P = 0.031);肥胖患者(BMI≥30kg/m²)中差异显著(平均差异:-30.0%;95%CI,-50.7%至-9.3%;P = 0.009),而非肥胖患者中差异不显著。德拉氟沙星组和利奈唑胺组的治愈率相似。采用数字测量法,随访时德拉氟沙星组红斑总面积的下降百分比显著高于万古霉素组(-96.4%对-84.5%;P = 0.028)。各治疗组在细菌清除方面无差异。最常报告的治疗中出现的不良事件为恶心、腹泻和呕吐。

结论

这些数据表明,德拉氟沙星治疗ABSSSI有效且耐受性良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/4743703/4b20d6367e95/dkv41101.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/4743703/4b20d6367e95/dkv41101.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f7/4743703/4b20d6367e95/dkv41101.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate subjective and objective outcomes in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections treated with delafloxacin, linezolid or vancomycin.一项随机、双盲的2期研究,旨在评估接受德拉氟沙星、利奈唑胺或万古霉素治疗的急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者的主观和客观结果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Mar;71(3):821-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv411. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
2
A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study.静脉注射后序贯口服多氟喹诺酮与万古霉素联合氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性比较:一项 3 期、多国、双盲、随机研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):657-666. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy165.
3
Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized study.比较 delafloxacin 与万古霉素加氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性:一项 3 期、双盲、随机研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Dec 1;72(12):3471-3480. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx329.
4
Analysis of Pooled Phase III Efficacy Data for Delafloxacin in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染中多相 III 期疗效数据的分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(Suppl 3):S223-S232. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz006.
5
Single-dose oritavancin versus 7-10 days of vancomycin in the treatment of gram-positive acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: the SOLO II noninferiority study.单剂奥塔万古霉素与 7-10 天万古霉素治疗革兰阳性急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染:SOLO II 非劣效性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 15;60(2):254-62. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu778. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
6
Once-weekly dalbavancin versus daily conventional therapy for skin infection.每周一次的达巴万星与每日常规疗法治疗皮肤感染。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2169-79. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310480.
7
Once-daily oral omadacycline versus twice-daily oral linezolid for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (OASIS-2): a phase 3, double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.每日口服奥马环素与每日口服利奈唑胺治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(OASIS-2):一项 3 期、双盲、多中心、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;19(10):1080-1090. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30275-0. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
A randomized phase 2 study comparing two doses of delafloxacin with tigecycline in adults with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.一项比较两种剂量的达拉非沙星与替加环素治疗成人复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的随机 2 期研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;30:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
9
Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.替考拉宁治疗 6 天与利奈唑胺治疗 10 天治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ESTABLISH-2):一项随机、双盲、III 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;14(8):696-705. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70737-6. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
10
Efficacy and safety of tigecycline monotherapy compared with vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: Results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial.替加环素单药治疗与万古霉素联合氨曲南治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项3期随机双盲试验的结果
Int J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep;9(5):251-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.003.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Active-Controlled, Phase IIIb Study to Compare IV/Oral Delafloxacin Fixed-Dose Monotherapy With Best Available Treatments in a Microbiologically Enriched Population With Surgical Site Infections: The DRESS Study.一项随机、观察者盲法、活性对照、IIIb期研究,旨在比较静脉注射/口服德拉氟沙星固定剂量单药疗法与最佳可用治疗方案在微生物富集的手术部位感染人群中的疗效:DRESS研究。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 29;12(9):ofaf476. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf476. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients.肥胖患者抗菌药物剂量调整的最新推荐。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 May 2;68(5):e0171923. doi: 10.1128/aac.01719-23. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized phase 2 study comparing two doses of delafloxacin with tigecycline in adults with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.一项比较两种剂量的达拉非沙星与替加环素治疗成人复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的随机 2 期研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;30:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
2
Obesity and the risk and outcome of infection.肥胖与感染的风险和结局。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Mar;37(3):333-40. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.62. Epub 2012 May 1.
3
Risk factors for clinical failure in patients hospitalized with cellulitis and cutaneous abscess.
Physicochemical Characteristics of Antimicrobials and Practical Recommendations for Intravenous Administration: A Systematic Review.
抗菌药物的物理化学特性及静脉给药实用建议:一项系统评价
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Aug 19;12(8):1338. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081338.
4
Updated Review on Clinically-Relevant Properties of Delafloxacin.关于德拉氟沙星临床相关特性的最新综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;12(8):1241. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12081241.
5
Necessity of vancomycin trough concentrations to manage uncomplicated acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a laboratory stewardship analysis.万古霉素谷浓度对于处理单纯性急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的必要性:一项实验室管理分析
Drugs Context. 2023 May 22;12. doi: 10.7573/dic.2023-2-1. eCollection 2023.
6
Linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity: a systematic review.利奈唑胺相关的 5-羟色胺毒性:系统评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jul;79(7):875-883. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03500-9. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Insufficient Representation of Patients With Obesity in Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Antimicrobials for Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Scoping Review.评估抗菌药物治疗皮肤和皮肤结构感染有效性及安全性的随机对照试验中肥胖患者代表性不足:一项范围综述
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 20;10(3):ofad144. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad144. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Overview of Side-Effects of Antibacterial Fluoroquinolones: New Drugs versus Old Drugs, a Step Forward in the Safety Profile?氟喹诺酮类抗菌药物的副作用概述:新药与旧药对比,安全性方面是否有所进步?
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Mar 1;15(3):804. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030804.
9
Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients.利奈唑胺在重症监护病房患者中的临床疗效与安全性
J Intensive Med. 2022 Jul 5;3(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.05.006. eCollection 2023 Jan 31.
10
MRSA compendium of epidemiology, transmission, pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention within one health framework.“同一个健康”框架下耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的流行病学、传播、病理生理学、治疗及预防概要
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1067284. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1067284. eCollection 2022.
住院治疗蜂窝织炎和皮肤脓肿患者临床治疗失败的风险因素。
J Infect. 2012 Aug;65(2):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children.美国传染病学会发布的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染成人和儿童治疗临床实践指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 1;52(3):e18-55. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq146. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
5
Recurrent skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus requiring operative debridement.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌导致的反复发作的皮肤和软组织感染,需要手术清创。
Am J Surg. 2011 Feb;201(2):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.024. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
6
Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.成人患者万古霉素的治疗监测:美国卫生系统药师协会、美国传染病学会和传染病药师协会的共识综述
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 1;66(1):82-98. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080434.
7
Position paper: recommended design features of future clinical trials of antibacterial agents for community-acquired pneumonia.立场文件:社区获得性肺炎抗菌药物未来临床试验的推荐设计特点
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S249-65.
8
Executive summary: workshop on issues in the design and conduct of clinical trials of antibacterial drugs in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.执行摘要:关于治疗社区获得性肺炎的抗菌药物临床试验设计与实施问题研讨会
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S105-7. doi: 10.1086/591389.
9
Antimicrobial dosing considerations in obese adult patients.肥胖成年患者的抗菌药物剂量考量
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Aug;27(8):1081-91. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.8.1081.
10
In vitro and bactericidal activities of ABT-492, a novel fluoroquinolone, against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms.新型氟喹诺酮类药物ABT-492对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性菌的体外抗菌及杀菌活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jul;48(7):2771-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2771-2777.2004.