Dandalides S M, Carey W D, Petras R, Achkar E
Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44106.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 May-Jun;35(3):197-200. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72757-7.
This study was designed to determine (1) whether the site of biopsy within the proximal small bowel affects the ability to assess mucosal architecture in general, or to confirm a diagnosis of celiac sprue specifically; and (2) whether endoscopic small bowel biopsy using standard forceps can obtain adequate biopsy specimens to detect or exclude mucosal abnormalities. Three-hundred fifty-two biopsy specimens were obtained prospectively from 26 patients (8 sprue, 2 nonspecific changes, 16 normal) with "jumbo" and standard forceps from jejunum, ligament of Treitz, fourth, third, and second portions of the duodenum. There was no difference in biopsy specimen quality from different locations. All celiac sprue patients had at least one good or excellent specimen from each location, thereby allowing the diagnosis to be made equally well from second, third, and fourth portions of the duodenum, as well as at the ligament of Treitz and jejunum. No false-positive diagnoses of celiac sprue were made. Finally, the standard biopsy forceps provided good or excellent specimens in all patients.
(1)近端小肠内活检部位是否会影响评估黏膜结构的总体能力,特别是确诊乳糜泻的能力;(2)使用标准钳进行内镜下小肠活检能否获取足够的活检标本以检测或排除黏膜异常。前瞻性地从26例患者(8例乳糜泻、2例非特异性改变、16例正常)中获取了352份活检标本,使用“大型”钳和标准钳分别从空肠、Treitz韧带、十二指肠第四、第三和第二部分取材。不同部位的活检标本质量没有差异。所有乳糜泻患者在每个部位至少有一份良好或优秀的标本,从而使十二指肠第二、第三和第四部分以及Treitz韧带和空肠的诊断效果相当。未做出乳糜泻的假阳性诊断。最后,标准活检钳在所有患者中均提供了良好或优秀的标本。