Suppr超能文献

法国一大群人中室内传导障碍的患病率

Prevalence of Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances in a Large French Population.

作者信息

Monin Jonathan, Bisconte Sébastien, Nicaise Aurore, Hornez Anne-Pia, Manen Olivier, Perrier Eric

机构信息

Department of Aeronautical Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases, Percy Military Hospital, Clamart, France.

Aeromedical Center, Robert Picqué Military Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 Sep;21(5):479-85. doi: 10.1111/anec.12331. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recommendations for the interpretation of electrocardiogram have been published in 2009. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICoDs) in a large population, using these recommendations.

METHODS

From 01/31/1996 to 09/22/2010, an electrocardiogram was performed at each visit for all aircrew members examined for fitness assessment in an aeromedical center. The prevalence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), incomplete LBBB, incomplete RBBB, nonspecific intraventricular disturbance (NIVCD), left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), and left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) was measured and compared by age and gender.

RESULTS

The global prevalence of ICoD was 3.09% in our population of 69,186 patients. The most frequent types of ventricular blocks were IRBBB (1.25%) and LAFB (1.10%), whereas RBBB (0.46%), LBBB (0.08%), ILBBB (0.03%), NIVCD (0.05%), and LPFB (0.13%) were rare findings. ICoDs are more frequent for males and older age groups (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Our results are comparable to studies concerning low cardiovascular risks populations. The association between ICoD and cardiovascular diseases needs to be studied in this population.

摘要

背景

心电图解读建议已于2009年发布。本研究的目的是使用这些建议确定一大群人中心室内传导障碍(ICoD)的患病率。

方法

从1996年1月31日至2010年9月22日,对航空医学中心接受健康评估检查的所有空勤人员每次就诊时均进行心电图检查。测量并比较左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)、右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)、不完全性LBBB、不完全性RBBB、非特异性心室内传导障碍(NIVCD)、左前分支传导阻滞(LAFB)和左后分支传导阻滞(LPFB)的患病率,并按年龄和性别进行比较。

结果

在我们的69186例患者人群中,ICoD的总体患病率为3.09%。最常见的心室传导阻滞类型是不完全性右束支传导阻滞(IRBBB,1.25%)和左前分支传导阻滞(LAFB,1.10%),而右束支传导阻滞(RBBB,0.46%)、左束支传导阻滞(LBBB,0.08%)、不完全性左束支传导阻滞(ILBBB,0.03%)、非特异性心室内传导障碍(NIVCD,0.05%)和左后分支传导阻滞(LPFB,0.13%)则较为少见。ICoD在男性和年龄较大的人群中更为常见(P < 0.001)。

讨论

我们的结果与关于低心血管风险人群的研究结果相当。需要在该人群中研究ICoD与心血管疾病之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances in a Large French Population.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 Sep;21(5):479-85. doi: 10.1111/anec.12331. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
2
Prevalence and incidence of intraventricular conduction disturbances among Chinese adults: Results from the Kailuan study.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 20;9:959781. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959781. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical factors associated with the intraventricular conduction disturbances in Swiss middle-aged adults: The CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study.
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 15;327:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Prevalence of Chagas Disease in a U.S. Population of Latin American Immigrants with Conduction Abnormalities on Electrocardiogram.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jan 5;11(1):e0005244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005244. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
Bundle branch block and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay prevalence using Chinese nationwide survey data.
J Int Med Res. 2022 Aug;50(8):3000605221119666. doi: 10.1177/03000605221119666.
7
9
Prevalence of ventricular conduction blocks in the resting electrocardiogram in a general population: the Health 2000 Survey.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and incidence of intraventricular conduction disturbances among Chinese adults: Results from the Kailuan study.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 20;9:959781. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959781. eCollection 2022.
2
Prevalence of major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities and their relationship with cardiovascular risk factors in Angolans.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Feb 9;39:100965. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100965. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Left posterior fascicular block, state-of-the-art review: A 2018 update.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018 Nov-Dec;18(6):217-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of ventricular conduction blocks in the resting electrocardiogram in a general population: the Health 2000 Survey.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 May 27.
3
4
Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch block in high-risk survivors of acute myocardial infarction: the VALIANT experience.
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Mar;4(3):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.021. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
7
Bundle-branch block in a general male population: the study of men born 1913.
Circulation. 1998 Dec 1;98(22):2494-500. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.22.2494.
8
Natural history of isolated bundle branch block.
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jun 1;77(14):1185-90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00160-9.
10
Left bundle branch block: prevalence, incidence, follow-up and outcome.
Eur Heart J. 1987 Oct;8(10):1075-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062172.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验