Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 15;327:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Intraventricular conduction disturbances are associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, data about factors associated with intraventricular conduction disturbances are sparse. We aimed to identify the clinical factors associated with intraventricular conduction disturbances in the general population.
Cross-sectional study in a sample of 3704 participants (age range 45-86 years, 55.2% women). Intraventricular conduction disturbances were defined as QRS > 110 ms on electrocardiograms, and classified into right bundle branch block (RBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB), left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) and non-specific intraventricular conduction disturbances (NIVCD).
The number of participants, the resulting prevalence (square brackets) and 95% CI (round brackets) of intraventricular conduction disturbances and subtypes (RBBB, LBBB, LAFB and NIVCD) were 187 [5.1% (4.4-5.8%)], 103 [2.9%, (2.3-3.4%)], 29 [0.8% (0.6-1.1%)], 31 (0.9% [0.6-1.2%]), and 47 [1.3% (0.9-1.7)], respectively. Multivariable logistic regression identified male sex [odds ratio and (95% CI): 2.55 (1.34-4.86)] and increasing age (p-value for trend <0.001) as being associated with RBBB; hypertension [3.08 (1.20-7.91)] and elevated NT-proBNP [3.26 (1.43-7.41)] as being associated with LBBB; elevated NT-proBNP [3.14 (1.32-7.46)] as being associated with LFAB; and male sex [5.97 (1.91-18.7)] and increased height [1.31 (1.06-1.63)] as being associated with NIVCD.
In a sample of the Swiss middle-aged population, the clinical factors associated with intraventricular conduction disturbances differed according to the intraventricular conduction disturbances subtype: male sex and ageing for RBBB; hypertension and elevated NT-proBNP for LBBB; elevated NT-proBNP for LAFB; and male sex and increased height for NIVCD.
室内传导障碍与不良心血管结局风险增加相关。然而,关于与室内传导障碍相关的因素的数据很少。我们的目的是确定一般人群中与室内传导障碍相关的临床因素。
这是一项在 3704 名参与者(年龄 45-86 岁,55.2%为女性)的样本中进行的横断面研究。室内传导障碍定义为心电图 QRS >110ms,并分为右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)、左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)、左前分支阻滞(LAFB)和非特异性室内传导障碍(NIVCD)。
参与者人数、室内传导障碍及其亚型(RBBB、LBBB、LAFB 和 NIVCD)的发生率(方括号)和 95%置信区间(圆括号)分别为 187[5.1%(4.4-5.8%)]、103[2.9%(2.3-3.4%)]、29[0.8%(0.6-1.1%)]、31[0.9%(0.6-1.2%)]和 47[1.3%(0.9-1.7%)]。多变量逻辑回归确定男性[比值比和(95%置信区间):2.55(1.34-4.86)]和年龄增长(趋势 p 值<0.001)与 RBBB 相关;高血压[3.08(1.20-7.91)]和升高的 NT-proBNP[3.26(1.43-7.41)]与 LBBB 相关;升高的 NT-proBNP[3.14(1.32-7.46)]与 LAFB 相关;男性[5.97(1.91-18.7)]和身高增加[1.31(1.06-1.63)]与 NIVCD 相关。
在瑞士中年人群的样本中,与室内传导障碍相关的临床因素因室内传导障碍亚型而异:RBBB 与男性和衰老相关;LBBB 与高血压和升高的 NT-proBNP 相关;LAFB 与升高的 NT-proBNP 相关;NIVCD 与男性和身高增加相关。