Negrini Stefano, Kiekens Carlotte, Zampolini Mauro, Wever Daniel, Varela Donoso Enrique, Christodoulou Nicolas
Clinical and Experimental Sciences Department, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Feb;52(1):134-41. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
Since 2009 the Professional Practice Committee of the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) Section of the European Union (EU) of Medical Specialists (UEMS) is producing Position Papers (PPs) on the role of PRM physicians for patients with different health conditions or related topics of PRM Interest. These PPs represent the Official Position of the EU in the specific field. Until now, sixteen papers have been produced, recently collected in an e-book. To proceed with the future PPs, the UEMS PRM Section defines with this paper the methodological approach to a PP, so to have a common and validated scientific structure. The final aim is to increase the quality, representativeness and visibility of this production for the benefit of all PRM specialists in (and out) of Europe. The Position Papers must be Evidence Based (EBPP). Therefore it comprises a systematic review as well as a Consensus procedure among the EU Countries delegates. All the sections of an EBPP are presented in details (title, authors, abstract, introduction, material and methods, results, discussion, conclusion). The systematic review must focus on Cochrane reviews, randomised controlled trials and guidelines of PRM professional practice interest. The Consensus on the recommendations must be reached through a Delphi procedure, usually in four major rounds (each round can have repeated voting). The EBPP must produce Final Recommendations for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Professional Practice in Europe. The following overall structure for recommendations is suggested: one overall general recommendation on PRM professional practice; PRM physicians' role in Medical Diagnosis - ICD; PRM diagnosis and assessment according to ICF; PRM process (Project definition, Team, PRM interventions, Outcome criteria, Length and continuity of treatment); future research on PRM professional practice.
自2009年以来,欧洲医学专家联盟(UEMS)物理与康复医学(PRM)分会的专业实践委员会一直在就PRM医生在不同健康状况患者或PRM相关主题中的作用撰写立场文件(PPs)。这些立场文件代表了欧盟在特定领域的官方立场。到目前为止,已经撰写了16篇文件,最近汇编成了一本电子书。为了推进未来的立场文件撰写工作,UEMS PRM分会通过本文确定了立场文件的方法学方法,以便拥有一个通用且经过验证的科学结构。最终目标是提高这一成果的质量、代表性和知名度,以造福欧洲内外的所有PRM专家。立场文件必须以证据为基础(EBPP)。因此,它包括系统评价以及欧盟国家代表之间的共识程序。EBPP的所有部分都有详细介绍(标题、作者、摘要、引言、材料与方法、结果、讨论、结论)。系统评价必须聚焦于Cochrane评价、随机对照试验以及PRM专业实践相关的指南。建议通过德尔菲程序就建议达成共识,通常分四轮进行(每轮可重复投票)。EBPP必须为欧洲物理与康复医学专业实践提出最终建议。建议的总体结构如下:关于PRM专业实践的一项总体一般性建议;PRM医生在医学诊断(ICD)中的作用;根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)进行的PRM诊断与评估;PRM流程(项目定义、团队、PRM干预、结果标准、治疗时长与连续性);PRM专业实践的未来研究。