Suppr超能文献

经典动脉粥样硬化危险因素对不同动脉区域的异质性影响:EPIC-Norfolk 前瞻性人群研究。

Heterogeneous impact of classic atherosclerotic risk factors on different arterial territories: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2016 Mar 14;37(11):880-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv630. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

Abstract

AIMS

Particular atherosclerotic risk factors may differ in their association with atherosclerosis across vascular territories. Few studies have compared the associations between multiple risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD) manifestations in one population. We studied the strength of the associations between traditional risk factors including coronary artery disease (CAD), ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This analysis included 21 798 participants of the EPIC-Norfolk population study, without previous CVD. Events were defined as hospitalization or mortality, coded using ICD-10. The associations between the risk factors, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and smoking, and the various CVD manifestations were compared using competing risk analyses. During 12.1 years, 3087 CVD events were recorded. The associations significantly differed across CVD manifestations. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was strongly associated with CAD [adjusted hazard rate (aHR) highest vs. lowest quartile 1.63, 95% CI 1.44-1.86]. Systolic blood pressure was a strong risk factor for PAD (aHR highest vs. lowest quartile 2.95, 95% CI 1.78-4.89) and ischaemic stroke (aHR highest vs. lowest quartile 2.48, 95% CI 1.55-3.97), but not for AAA. Smoking was strongly associated with incident AAA (aHR current vs. never 7.66, 95% CI 4.50-13.04) and PAD (aHR current vs. never 4.66, 95% CI 3.29-6.61), but not with haemorrhagic stroke.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity in the risk factor-CVD associations supports the concept of pathophysiological differences between atherosclerotic CVD manifestations and could have implications for CVD prevention.

摘要

目的

特定的动脉粥样硬化危险因素与不同血管区域的动脉粥样硬化之间的关联可能存在差异。很少有研究比较同一人群中多种危险因素与心血管疾病(CVD)表现之间的关联。我们研究了包括冠心病(CAD)、缺血性和出血性中风、腹主动脉瘤(AAA)和外周动脉疾病(PAD)在内的传统危险因素与 CVD 表现之间的关联强度。

方法和结果

本分析纳入了 EPIC-Norfolk 人群研究的 21798 名无既往 CVD 的参与者。事件定义为住院或死亡,使用 ICD-10 进行编码。使用竞争风险分析比较了危险因素(如低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、收缩压(SBP)和吸烟)与各种 CVD 表现之间的关联。在 12.1 年的随访期间,记录了 3087 例 CVD 事件。这些关联在 CVD 表现之间存在显著差异。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇与 CAD 密切相关[最高与最低四分位组的校正风险比(aHR)为 1.63,95%CI 1.44-1.86]。收缩压是 PAD(最高与最低四分位组的 aHR 为 2.95,95%CI 1.78-4.89)和缺血性中风(最高与最低四分位组的 aHR 为 2.48,95%CI 1.55-3.97)的强烈危险因素,但与 AAA 无关。吸烟与 AAA(当前与从不吸烟的 aHR 为 7.66,95%CI 4.50-13.04)和 PAD(当前与从不吸烟的 aHR 为 4.66,95%CI 3.29-6.61)的发病风险密切相关,但与出血性中风无关。

结论

危险因素与 CVD 之间的关联存在异质性,支持动脉粥样硬化性 CVD 表现之间存在病理生理学差异的概念,这可能对 CVD 预防具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验