Bann David, Wright Liam, Hughes Alun, Chaturvedi Nish
Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, IOE, UCL's Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK.
MRC Unit for Lifelong Health & Ageing at UCL, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Science, University College London, London, UK.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024 Apr;21(4):238-249. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00941-8. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) persist in high-income countries despite marked overall declines in CVD-related morbidity and mortality. After decades of research, the field has struggled to unequivocally answer a crucial question: is the association between low socioeconomic position (SEP) and the development of CVD causal? We review relevant evidence from various study designs and disciplinary perspectives. Traditional observational, family-based and Mendelian randomization studies support the widely accepted view that low SEP causally influences CVD. However, results from quasi-experimental and experimental studies are both limited and equivocal. While more experimental and quasi-experimental studies are needed to aid causal understanding and inform policy, high-quality descriptive studies are also required to document inequalities, investigate their contextual dependence and consider SEP throughout the lifespan; no simple hierarchy of evidence exists for an exposure as complex as SEP. The COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the context-dependent nature of CVD inequalities, with the generation of potentially new causal pathways linking SEP and CVD. The linked goals of understanding the causal nature of SEP and CVD associations, their contextual dependence, and their remediation by policy interventions necessitate a detailed understanding of society, its change over time and the phenotypes of CVD. Interdisciplinary research is therefore key to advancing both causal understanding and policy translation.
尽管心血管疾病(CVD)相关的发病率和死亡率总体上显著下降,但高收入国家中CVD的社会经济不平等现象依然存在。经过数十年的研究,该领域一直难以明确回答一个关键问题:社会经济地位低下(SEP)与CVD发生之间的关联是否具有因果关系?我们从各种研究设计和学科角度审视相关证据。传统的观察性研究、基于家庭的研究和孟德尔随机化研究支持了被广泛接受的观点,即低SEP会对CVD产生因果影响。然而,准实验性研究和实验性研究的结果都有限且模棱两可。虽然需要更多的实验性研究和准实验性研究来帮助理解因果关系并为政策提供依据,但也需要高质量的描述性研究来记录不平等现象、调查其背景依赖性并考虑整个生命周期中的SEP;对于像SEP这样复杂的暴露因素,不存在简单的证据等级划分。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行说明了CVD不平等现象的背景依赖性,以及产生了将SEP与CVD联系起来的潜在新因果途径。理解SEP与CVD关联的因果性质、其背景依赖性以及通过政策干预进行补救的相关目标,需要详细了解社会、其随时间的变化以及CVD的表型。因此,跨学科研究是推进因果理解和政策转化的关键。