Walenkamp Monique M J, Bentohami Abdelali, Slaar Annelie, Beerekamp M Suzan H, Maas Mario, Jager L Cara, Sosef Nico L, van Velde Romuald, Ultee Jan M, Steyerberg Ewout W, Goslings J Carel, Schep Niels W L
Department of Surgery, Trauma Unit, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Dec 18;16:389. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2.
Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emergency Department (ED) for radiography.
This multicenter prospective study consisted of three components: (1) derivation of a clinical prediction model for detecting wrist fractures in patients following wrist trauma; (2) external validation of this model; and (3) design of a clinical decision rule. The study was conducted in the EDs of five Dutch hospitals: one academic hospital (derivation cohort) and four regional hospitals (external validation cohort). We included all adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The main outcome was fracture of the wrist (distal radius, distal ulna or carpal bones) diagnosed on conventional X-rays.
A total of 882 patients were analyzed; 487 in the derivation cohort and 395 in the validation cohort. We derived a clinical prediction model with eight variables: age; sex, swelling of the wrist; swelling of the anatomical snuffbox, visible deformation; distal radius tender to palpation; pain on radial deviation and painful axial compression of the thumb. The Area Under the Curve at external validation of this model was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.77-0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) in the external validation cohort were 98 % (95 % CI: 95-99 %) and 21 % (95 % CI: 15 %-28). The negative predictive value was 90 % (95 % CI: 81-99 %).
The Amsterdam Wrist Rules is a clinical prediction rule with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for fractures of the wrist. Although external validation showed low specificity and 100 % sensitivity could not be achieved, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules can provide physicians in the Emergency Department with a useful screening tool to select patients with acute wrist trauma for radiography. The upcoming implementation study will further reveal the impact of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules on the anticipated reduction of X-rays requested, missed fractures, Emergency Department waiting times and health care costs.
This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry, reference number NTR2544 on October 1(st), 2010.
尽管仅有39%的腕部创伤患者发生了骨折,但大多数此类患者仍按常规接受了X线检查。本研究旨在推导并外部验证一种临床决策规则,用于在急诊科(ED)筛选需要进行X线检查的急性腕部创伤患者。
这项多中心前瞻性研究包括三个部分:(1)推导用于检测腕部创伤患者腕部骨折的临床预测模型;(2)对该模型进行外部验证;(3)设计临床决策规则。研究在荷兰五家医院的急诊科开展:一家学术医院(推导队列)和四家地区医院(外部验证队列)。我们纳入了所有急性腕部创伤的成年患者。主要结局是通过传统X线诊断的腕部骨折(桡骨远端、尺骨远端或腕骨)。
共分析了882例患者;推导队列中有487例,验证队列中有395例。我们推导了一个包含八个变量的临床预测模型:年龄、性别、腕部肿胀、解剖学鼻烟壶肿胀、可见畸形、桡骨远端压痛、桡偏时疼痛以及拇指轴向挤压疼痛。该模型在外部验证时的曲线下面积为0.81(95%CI:0.77 - 0.85)。阿姆斯特丹腕部规则(AWR)在外部验证队列中的敏感性和特异性分别为98%(95%CI:95 - 99%)和21%(95%CI:15% - 28%)。阴性预测值为90%(95%CI:81 - 99%)。
阿姆斯特丹腕部规则是一种对腕部骨折具有高敏感性和阴性预测值的临床预测规则。尽管外部验证显示特异性较低且无法达到100%的敏感性,但阿姆斯特丹腕部规则可为急诊科医生提供一种有用的筛查工具,以筛选需要进行X线检查的急性腕部创伤患者。即将开展的实施研究将进一步揭示阿姆斯特丹腕部规则对预期减少X线检查申请、漏诊骨折、急诊科候诊时间和医疗费用的影响。
本研究已在荷兰试验注册中心注册,注册号为NTR2544,注册时间为2010年10月1日。