Becker Dawn M, Tafoya Chelsea A, Becker Sören L, Kruger Grant H, Tafoya Matthew J, Becker Torben K
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor - St. Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Mar;21(3):294-311. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12657. Epub 2016 Jan 10.
To review the scientific literature pertaining to the use of hand-carried and hand-held ultrasound devices in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), with a focus on clinical applications, geographical areas of use, the impact on patient management and technical features of the devices used.
The electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar were searched. No language or date restrictions were applied. Case reports and original research describing the use of hand-carried ultrasound devices in LMIC were included if agreed upon as relevant by two-reviewer consensus based on our predefined research questions.
A total of 644 articles were found and screened, and 36 manuscripts were included for final review. Twenty-seven studies were original research articles, and nine were case reports. Several reports describe the successful diagnosis and management of difficult, often life-threatening conditions, using hand-carried and hand-held ultrasound. These portable ultrasound devices have also been studied for cardiac screening exams, as well as a rapid triage tool in rural areas and after natural disaster. Most applications focus on obstetrical and abdominal complaints. Portable ultrasound may have an impact on clinical management in up to 70% of all cases. However, no randomised controlled trials have evaluated the impact of ultrasound-guided diagnosis and treatment in resource-constrained settings. The exclusion of articles published in journals not listed in the large databases may have biased our results. Our findings are limited by the lack of higher quality evidence (e.g. controlled trials).
Hand-carried and hand-held ultrasound is successfully being used to triage, diagnose and treat patients with a variety of complaints in LMIC. However, the quality of the current evidence is low. There is an urgent need to perform larger clinical trials assessing the impact of hand-carried ultrasound in LMIC.
回顾与中低收入国家(LMIC)使用便携式和手持式超声设备相关的科学文献,重点关注临床应用、使用的地理区域、对患者管理的影响以及所用设备的技术特征。
检索电子数据库PubMed和谷歌学术。未设置语言或日期限制。如果两名审稿人根据我们预先定义的研究问题达成共识,认为相关,则纳入描述在中低收入国家使用便携式超声设备的病例报告和原始研究。
共检索并筛选出644篇文章,36篇手稿纳入最终评审。27项研究为原始研究文章,9项为病例报告。若干报告描述了使用便携式和手持式超声成功诊断和管理疑难且常危及生命的病症。这些便携式超声设备还用于心脏筛查检查,以及作为农村地区和自然灾害后的快速分诊工具。大多数应用集中于产科和腹部疾病。便携式超声在高达70%的病例中可能对临床管理产生影响。然而,尚无随机对照试验评估资源受限环境中超声引导下诊断和治疗的影响。排除大型数据库未列出的期刊发表的文章可能使我们的结果产生偏差。我们的研究结果因缺乏高质量证据(如对照试验)而受到限制。
在中低收入国家,便携式和手持式超声正成功用于对各种病症患者进行分诊、诊断和治疗。然而,当前证据质量较低。迫切需要开展更大规模的临床试验,评估便携式超声在中低收入国家的影响。