Goldenhar Linda M, Stafford Pete
CPWR: The Center for Construction Research and Training, 8484 Georgia Ave. Suite 1000, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
J Safety Res. 2015 Dec;55:73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSD) account for approximately one-third of all injuries in the U.S. construction industry. Many companies have implemented stretch and flex (s/f) programs to reduce WMSD despite a lack of evidence showing effectiveness.
We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand (a) why employers continue devoting resources to s/f programs; (b) how programs vary; and (c) any actual or perceived benefits.
Nineteen safety and health professionals were interviewed and 133 more (13.3% response rate) completed an on-line survey. Fifty-six percent had implemented an s/f program with the primary goal of reducing WMSDs; though most did not review data to determine goal achievement. Program structure varied in terms of duration, frequency, and type of stretches. There was strong agreement about mandating attendance but not participation, due primarily to liability issues. Cost was a factor when deciding to implement a program but not for sustaining one. The majority had not implemented other ergonomic prevention activities, but many had started conducting daily safety huddles for task and safety planning. Those reporting a reduction in WMSDs agreed that it was not due to the s/f program alone and that other benefits included increased worker camaraderie, communication, and collaboration.
Although there is little to no scientific evidence showing that they work as intended, construction companies continue to implement s/f programs with the goal of reducing WMSDs. Bringing work crews together for s/f activities has prompted employers to also begin conducting daily safety huddles. Although employers may not be able to link reduced WMDS to an s/f program, the ancillary benefits may warrant the time and resources.
S/f programs should be only one component of a more comprehensive ergonomics prevention program. Conducting daily safety huddles at the same time also may enhance worker communication, camaraderie, collaboration and improve safety outcomes.
与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSD)约占美国建筑业所有损伤的三分之一。尽管缺乏有效性证据,但许多公司仍实施伸展和屈伸(s/f)计划以减少WMSD。
我们进行了一项混合方法研究,以了解(a)雇主为何继续为s/f计划投入资源;(b)计划如何不同;以及(c)任何实际或感知到的益处。
对19名安全与健康专业人员进行了访谈,另有133人(回复率为13.3%)完成了在线调查。56%的人实施了s/f计划,主要目标是减少WMSD;不过大多数人并未审查数据以确定目标是否实现。计划结构在持续时间、频率和伸展类型方面各不相同。在强制出勤而非参与方面存在强烈共识,主要是由于责任问题。成本是决定实施计划时的一个因素,但不是维持计划的因素。大多数人尚未实施其他工效学预防活动,但许多人已开始为任务和安全规划进行每日安全碰头会。那些报告WMSD有所减少的人一致认为,这并非仅归因于s/f计划,其他益处包括增强了员工之间的情谊、沟通与协作。
尽管几乎没有科学证据表明它们能按预期发挥作用,但建筑公司仍继续实施s/f计划,目标是减少WMSD。将施工人员聚集进行s/f活动促使雇主也开始进行每日安全碰头会。尽管雇主可能无法将WMSD的减少与s/f计划联系起来,但附带益处可能值得投入时间和资源。
s/f计划应只是更全面的工效学预防计划的一个组成部分。同时进行每日安全碰头会也可能增强员工沟通、情谊、协作并改善安全成果。