Kable Ashley, Chenoweth Lynnette, Pond Dimity, Hullick Carolyn
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Faculty of Health, University of Technology, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 18;15:567. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1227-z.
Healthcare professionals engage in discharge planning of people with dementia during hospitalisation, however plans for transitioning the person into community services can be patchy and ineffective. The aim of this study was to report acute, community and residential care health professionals' (HP) perspectives on the discharge process and transitional care arrangements for people with dementia and their carers.
A qualitative descriptive study design and purposive sampling was used to recruit HPs from four groups: Nurses and allied health practitioners involved in discharge planning in the acute setting, junior medical officers in acute care, general practitioners (GPs) and Residential Aged Care Facility (RACF) staff in a regional area in NSW, Australia. Focus group discussions were conducted using a semi-structured schedule. Content analysis was used to understand the discharge process and transitional care arrangements for people with dementia (PWD) and their carers.
There were 33 participants in four focus groups, who described discharge planning and transitional care as a complex process with multiple contributors and components. Two main themes with belonging sub-themes derived from the analysis were: Barriers to effective discharge planning for PWD and their carers - the acute care perspective: managing PWD in the acute care setting, demand for post discharge services exceeds availability of services, pressure to discharge patients and incomplete discharge documentation. Transitional care process failures and associated outcomes for PWD - the community HP perspective: failures in delivery of services to PWD; inadequate discharge notification and negative patient outcomes; discharge-related adverse events, readmission and carer stress; and issues with medication discharge orders and outcomes for PWD.
Although acute care HPs do engage in required discharge planning for people with dementia, participants identified critical issues: pressure on acute care health professionals to discharge PWD early, the requirement for JMOs to complete discharge summaries, the demand for post discharge services for PWD exceeding supply, the need to modify post discharge medication prescriptions for PWD, the need for improved coordination with RACF, and the need for routine provision of medication dose decision aids and home medicine reviews post discharge for PWD and their carers.
医疗保健专业人员在患者住院期间参与痴呆症患者的出院计划制定,然而,将患者过渡到社区服务的计划可能并不完善且效果不佳。本研究的目的是报告急症、社区和住院护理健康专业人员(HP)对痴呆症患者及其护理人员出院过程和过渡性护理安排的看法。
采用定性描述性研究设计和目的抽样法,从四组人员中招募健康专业人员:参与急症环境出院计划的护士和专职医疗人员、急症护理初级医务人员、全科医生(GP)以及澳大利亚新南威尔士州一个地区的老年护理机构(RACF)工作人员。使用半结构化日程安排进行焦点小组讨论。采用内容分析法来了解痴呆症患者(PWD)及其护理人员的出院过程和过渡性护理安排。
四个焦点小组共有33名参与者,他们将出院计划和过渡性护理描述为一个复杂的过程,有多个参与者和组成部分。分析得出的两个主要主题及其下属子主题分别是:痴呆症患者及其护理人员有效出院计划的障碍——急症护理视角:在急症护理环境中管理痴呆症患者、出院后服务需求超过服务可及性、患者出院压力以及出院文件不完整。痴呆症患者的过渡性护理过程失败及相关结果——社区健康专业人员视角:向痴呆症患者提供服务失败;出院通知不足及负面患者结果;与出院相关的不良事件、再次入院和护理人员压力;以及药物出院医嘱问题和痴呆症患者的结果。
尽管急症护理健康专业人员确实为痴呆症患者进行了必要的出院计划制定,但参与者指出了关键问题:急症护理健康专业人员让痴呆症患者提前出院的压力、初级医务人员完成出院总结的要求、痴呆症患者出院后服务需求超过供应、需要为痴呆症患者调整出院后药物处方、需要改善与老年护理机构的协调,以及需要为痴呆症患者及其护理人员常规提供药物剂量决策辅助工具和出院后家庭用药审查。