Notarnicola Angela, Maccagnano Giuseppe, Moretti Lorenzo, Pesce Vito, Tafuri Silvio, Fiore Alessandra, Moretti Biagio
Course of Motor and Sports Sciences, Department of Medical Science of Basis, Neuroscience and Organs of Sense, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Study of Bari, Bari, Italy Orthopedics Section, Department of Medical Science of Basis, Neuroscience and Organs of Sense, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Study of Bari, General Hospital, Bari, Italy
Orthopedics Section, Department of Medical Science of Basis, Neuroscience and Organs of Sense, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Study of Bari, General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;29(1):140-6. doi: 10.1177/0394632015622215. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
Until now glucosamine sulfate (GS) has been the most widely used supplement and has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) and boswellic acids (BA) are new effective supplements for the management of inflammation and joint degeneration, according to previous experimental studies. The aim of our study is to test the effectiveness of association of MSM and BA in comparison with GS in knee arthritis.In this prospective randomized clinical trial, MEBAGA (Methylsulfonylmethane and Boswellic Acids versus Glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee Arthritis), 120 participants affected by arthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to an experimental group (MB group) or a control group (GS group) treated for 60 days with 5 g of MSM and 7.2 mg of BA or with 1500 mg of GS daily, respectively. At the 2-month (T1) and 6-months (T2) follow-up , the efficacy of these two nutraceuticals was assessed using the visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the Lequesne Index (LI) for joint function, along with the use of anti-inflammatory drugs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anti-cyclooxygenase-2).The repeated measures ANOVA analysis shows that for VAS, LI, and the use of anti-inflammatory drugs scores there are improvements due to the time in the two groups (respectively, F=26.0; P<0.0001; F=4.15; P=0.02; F=3.38; P=0.04), with a tendency to better values for the MB group at T2.On the basis of these preliminary data, we could support the efficacy of the MSM in association with BA in the treatment of OA. These results are consistent with the anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects previously occurred in experimental studies. This new combination of integration (MSM and BS) has presented good results and satisfactory in comparison with GS, until now the cornerstone of the treatment of arthritis in according to guidelines.
到目前为止,硫酸葡萄糖胺(GS)一直是使用最广泛的补充剂,并且已被证明在骨关节炎(OA)的治疗中有效。根据先前的实验研究,甲基磺酰甲烷(MSM)和乳香酸(BA)是用于管理炎症和关节退变的新型有效补充剂。我们研究的目的是测试MSM和BA联合使用与GS相比在膝关节炎治疗中的有效性。在这项前瞻性随机临床试验MEBAGA(甲基磺酰甲烷和乳香酸与硫酸葡萄糖胺治疗膝关节炎对比研究)中,120名膝关节炎患者被随机分配到实验组(MB组)或对照组(GS组),分别接受为期60天的每日5克MSM和7.2毫克BA或1500毫克GS的治疗。在2个月(T1)和6个月(T2)随访时,使用视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)和用于关节功能的Lequesne指数(LI),以及使用抗炎药物(非甾体抗炎药和抗环氧化酶-2)来评估这两种营养保健品的疗效。重复测量方差分析表明,对于VAS、LI和抗炎药物使用评分,两组随时间均有改善(分别为F = 26.0;P < 0.0001;F = 4.15;P = 0.02;F = 3.38;P = 0.04),在T2时MB组有更好值的趋势。基于这些初步数据,我们可以支持MSM与BA联合使用在OA治疗中的有效性。这些结果与先前实验研究中出现的抗炎和软骨保护作用一致。这种新的联合制剂(MSM和BA)与GS相比呈现出良好且令人满意的结果,GS直到现在都是根据指南治疗关节炎的基石。