Suppr超能文献

双侧力量不足并非源于神经;而是由于测力计的机械结构。

Bilateral Strength Deficit Is Not Neural in Origin; Rather Due to Dynamometer Mechanical Configuration.

作者信息

Simoneau-Buessinger Emilie, Leteneur Sébastien, Toumi Anis, Dessurne Alexandra, Gabrielli François, Barbier Franck, Jakobi Jennifer M

机构信息

Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d'Informatique industrielles et Humaines (LAMIH)-UMR CNRS 8201, Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis (UVHC), Valenciennes, France.

Laboratoire de l'Effort et du Mouvement, Haute Ecole Provinciale de Hainaut (HEPH)-Condorcet, Tournai, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 18;10(12):e0145077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145077. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

During maximal contractions, the sum of forces exerted by homonymous muscles unilaterally is typically higher than the sum of forces exerted by the same muscles bilaterally. However, the underlying mechanism(s) of this phenomenon, which is known as the bilateral strength deficit, remain equivocal. One potential factor that has received minimal attention is the contribution of body adjustments to bilateral and unilateral force production. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the plantar-flexors in an innovative dynamometer that permitted the influence of torque from body adjustments to be adapted. Participants were identically positioned between two setup configurations where torques generated from body adjustments were included within the net ankle torque (locked-unit) or independent of the ankle (open-unit). Twenty healthy adult males performed unilateral and bilateral maximal voluntary isometric plantar-flexion contractions using the dynamometer in the open and locked-unit mechanical configurations. While there was a significant bilateral strength deficit in the locked-unit (p = 0.01), it was not evident in the open-unit (p = 0.07). In the locked-unit, unilateral torque was greater than in the open-unit (p<0.001) and this was due to an additional torque from the body since the electromyographic activity of the agonist muscles did not differ between the two setups (p>0.05). This study revealed that the mechanical configuration of the dynamometer and then the body adjustments caused the observation of a bilateral strength deficit.

摘要

在最大收缩过程中,同侧肌肉单侧施加的力的总和通常高于相同肌肉双侧施加的力的总和。然而,这种被称为双侧力量 deficit 的现象的潜在机制仍然不明确。一个很少受到关注的潜在因素是身体调整对双侧和单侧力量产生的贡献。本研究的目的是在一种创新的测力计中评估跖屈肌,该测力计允许调整来自身体调整的扭矩的影响。参与者在两种设置配置之间处于相同位置,其中来自身体调整产生的扭矩包含在净踝关节扭矩内(锁定单元)或独立于踝关节(开放单元)。20 名健康成年男性在开放和锁定单元机械配置下使用测力计进行单侧和双侧最大自主等长跖屈收缩。虽然在锁定单元中存在显著的双侧力量 deficit(p = 0.01),但在开放单元中并不明显(p = 0.07)。在锁定单元中,单侧扭矩大于开放单元(p<0.001),这是由于来自身体的额外扭矩,因为两种设置下主动肌的肌电图活动没有差异(p>0.05)。这项研究表明,测力计的机械配置以及随后的身体调整导致了双侧力量 deficit 的观察结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c795/4684274/6c0cc39a271d/pone.0145077.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验