School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057549. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
Bilateral deficit (BLD) describes the phenomenon of a reduction in performance during synchronous bilateral (BL) movements when compared to the sum of identical unilateral (UL) movements. Despite a large body of research investigating BLD of maximal voluntary force (MVF) there exist a paucity of research examining the BLD for explosive strength. Therefore, this study investigated the BLD in voluntary and electrically-evoked explosive isometric contractions of the knee extensors and assessed agonist and antagonist neuromuscular activation and measurement artefacts as potential mechanisms. Thirteen healthy untrained males performed a series of maximum and explosive voluntary contractions bilaterally (BL) and unilaterally (UL). UL and BL evoked twitch and octet contractions were also elicited. Two separate load cells were used to measure MVF and explosive force at 50, 100 and 150 ms after force onset. Surface EMG amplitude was measured from three superficial agonists and an antagonist. Rate of force development (RFD) and EMG were reported over consecutive 50 ms periods (0-50, 50-100 and 100-150 ms). Performance during UL contractions was compared to combined BL performance to measure BLD. Single limb performance during the BL contractions was assessed and potential measurement artefacts, including synchronisation of force onset from the two limbs, controlled for. MVF showed no BLD (P = 0.551), but there was a BLD for explosive force at 100 ms (11.2%, P = 0.007). There was a BLD in RFD 50-100 ms (14.9%, P = 0.004), but not for the other periods. Interestingly, there was a BLD in evoked force measures (6.3-9.0%, P<0.001). There was no difference in agonist or antagonist EMG for any condition (P≥0.233). Measurement artefacts contributed minimally to the observed BLD. The BLD in volitional explosive force found here could not be explained by measurement issues, or agonist and antagonist neuromuscular activation. The BLD in voluntary and evoked explosive force might indicate insufficient stabiliser muscle activation during BL explosive contractions.
双侧缺陷(BLD)描述了在进行同步双侧(BL)运动时,与相同单侧(UL)运动的总和相比,运动表现降低的现象。尽管有大量研究调查了最大自愿力(MVF)的 BLD,但对于爆发力的 BLD 研究却很少。因此,本研究调查了自愿和电诱发的膝关节伸肌等长爆发力收缩的 BLD,并评估了激动剂和拮抗剂神经肌肉激活以及测量伪影作为潜在机制。13 名健康未训练的男性分别进行了一系列双侧(BL)和单侧(UL)最大和爆发力自愿收缩。还引出了 UL 和 BL 诱发的 twitch 和 octet 收缩。使用两个单独的称重传感器来测量力起始后 50、100 和 150ms 时的 MVF 和爆发力。从三个浅层激动剂和一个拮抗剂测量表面肌电图振幅。报告了在连续的 50ms 期间(0-50、50-100 和 100-150ms)的 RFD 和 EMG。将 UL 收缩期间的表现与组合 BL 表现进行比较,以测量 BLD。评估了 BL 收缩期间单肢的表现,并控制了包括两条腿力起始同步在内的潜在测量伪影。MVF 没有 BLD(P=0.551),但在 100ms 时爆发力有 BLD(11.2%,P=0.007)。在 RFD 50-100ms 期间有 BLD(14.9%,P=0.004),但在其他时间段没有。有趣的是,在诱发力测量中也存在 BLD(6.3-9.0%,P<0.001)。在任何情况下,激动剂或拮抗剂的 EMG 都没有差异(P≥0.233)。观察到的 BLD 主要归因于测量伪影。此处发现的自愿性爆发力的 BLD 不能用测量问题或激动剂和拮抗剂神经肌肉激活来解释。自愿和诱发的爆发力的 BLD 可能表明在 BL 爆发力收缩期间稳定器肌肉的激活不足。