Huntington Scott F, Weiss Brendan M, Vogl Dan T, Cohen Adam D, Garfall Alfred L, Mangan Patricia A, Doshi Jalpa A, Stadtmauer Edward A
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Division of Internal Medicine and the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Division of Internal Medicine and the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lancet Haematol. 2015 Oct;2(10):e408-16. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00151-9. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
Financial toxicity is increasingly recognised as adversely affecting the quality of life and medication adherence in patients with cancer in the USA. Patients with multiple myeloma might be particularly vulnerable because of high use of novel treatments and extended treatment duration.
Between Aug 18, 2014, and Jan 7, 2015, we did a cross-sectional survey of individuals receiving at least 3 months of ongoing treatment for multiple myeloma at a tertiary academic medical centre in the USA. The survey was derived from previous reported studies and included the 11-item COST measure (financial toxicity score range 0-44). A paper survey was offered to eligible patients on arrival for routine follow-up visits, and participants were asked to complete the survey before or after their visit to the clinic. Insurance and treatment data were obtained from patients' electronic health records.
Of 111 patients approached for the study, 100 individuals completed the survey. 59 (59%) of 100 patients reported that treatment costs were higher than expected, 70 (71%) of 99 had at least minor financial burden, and 36 (36%) of 100 reported applying for financial assistance. Use of savings to pay for myeloma treatment was common (43 [46%] of 94 patients) and 21 (21%) of 98 individuals borrowed money to pay for medications. COST scores were highly correlated with patient-reported use of strategies to cope with myeloma treatment expenses. On multivariable analysis, younger age (correlation coefficient β 0·36, 95% CI 0·15 to 0·56, p=0·00092), non-married status (5·6, 1·5 to 9·6, p=0·0074), longer duration since diagnosis (-4·8, -9·3 to -0·2, p=0·042), and lower household income (US$40 000-79 999: 7·8, 2·7 to 12·9, p=0·0031; ≥$80 000: 11·8, 7·1 to 16·4, p<0·0001) were associated with higher financial burden as measured with the COST score.
Patient-reported financial toxicity and use of coping mechanisms were common in our insured population with multiple myeloma. Additional attention to rising treatment costs and cost sharing is needed to address the increasing evidence of financial toxicity affecting patients with cancer.
University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
在美国,经济毒性对癌症患者生活质量和药物依从性的不利影响日益受到认可。多发性骨髓瘤患者可能尤其脆弱,因为新型治疗的高使用率以及治疗持续时间长。
2014年8月18日至2015年1月7日期间,我们在美国一家三级学术医疗中心对接受至少3个月持续治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者进行了一项横断面调查。该调查源自先前报道的研究,包括11项COST测量指标(经济毒性评分范围为0 - 44)。在符合条件的患者前来进行常规随访就诊时,向其提供纸质调查问卷,并要求参与者在就诊前或就诊后完成调查。保险和治疗数据从患者的电子健康记录中获取。
在邀请参与研究的111名患者中,100人完成了调查。100名患者中有59人(59%)报告治疗费用高于预期,99名患者中有70人(71%)至少有轻微经济负担,100名患者中有36人(36%)报告申请了经济援助。动用储蓄支付骨髓瘤治疗费用很常见(94名患者中有43人[46%]),98名患者中有21人(21%)借钱支付药物费用。COST评分与患者报告的应对骨髓瘤治疗费用策略的使用高度相关。多变量分析显示,年龄较小(相关系数β 0·36,95% CI 0·15至0·56,p = 0·00092)、未婚状态(5·6,1·5至9·6,p = 0·0074)、诊断后时间较长(-4·8,-9·3至-0·2,p = 0·042)以及家庭收入较低(40000 - 79999美元:7·8,2·7至12·9,p = 0·0031;≥80000美元:11·8,7·1至16·4,p < 0·0001)与以COST评分衡量的较高经济负担相关。
在我们参保的多发性骨髓瘤患者群体中,患者报告的经济毒性和应对机制的使用很常见。鉴于越来越多的证据表明经济毒性影响癌症患者,需要对不断上涨的治疗费用和费用分担给予更多关注。
宾夕法尼亚大学佩雷尔曼医学院。