经济毒性对胰腺癌治疗依从性和生活质量的影响。

Impact of Financial Toxicity on Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Pancreatic Cancer.

作者信息

Schleimer Lauren E, Aviki Emeline, Kalvin Hannah L, Magnin Josephine, Sokolowski Stefania S, Kingham T Peter, O'Reilly Eileen M, Varghese Anna M, Soares Kevin C, Drebin Jeffrey, D'Angelica Michael I, Jarnagin William R, Gonen Mithat, Thom Bridgette, Wei Alice C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Dec 20:OP2400528. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00528.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Financial toxicity (FT) is increasingly recognized as a major issue in cancer care. We evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for FT in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and FT associations with treatment adherence and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

A screening questionnaire based on the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) was implemented at our National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Respondents with pathologic diagnosis of PDAC who completed >50% of prompts between June 2022 and June 2023 were analyzed. COST ≤16 was categorized as FT. Associations between FT and demographic and clinical factors were assessed using logistic regression, and QOL was assessed using linear regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1,888 patients with PDAC, 1,162 completed the COST questionnaire, and 1,079 met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of FT was 23% (n = 245); 37% of patients with FT reported medication nonadherence due to cost. Demographic factors and poor performance status were associated with FT. Treatment-naïve patients were more likely to report FT compared with those on induction, adjuvant, or palliative therapy ( = .049). Patients experiencing FT reported worse QOL, with a median score of 5 (IQR, 4-7) versus 8 (IQR, 6-9) without FT. This relationship persisted after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors; the effect size of FT (β = -1.5; 95% CI, -1.1 to -1.9) was nearly double that of poor performance status (β = -.8; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.4).

CONCLUSION

FT affected nearly one in four patients with PDAC at a high-volume cancer center and was associated with worse QOL and medication nonadherence. Universal screening and interventions to reduce FT are warranted. Clinical trials investigating QOL as an end point must account for potential confounding due to FT.

摘要

目的

经济毒性(FT)日益被视为癌症治疗中的一个主要问题。我们评估了胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者中FT的患病率和危险因素,以及FT与治疗依从性和生活质量(QOL)的关联。

方法

在我们国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心实施了一项基于经济毒性综合评分(COST)的筛查问卷。对2022年6月至2023年6月间完成>50%提示项且经病理诊断为PDAC的受访者进行分析。COST≤16被归类为FT。使用逻辑回归评估FT与人口统计学和临床因素之间的关联,使用线性回归评估QOL。

结果

在1888例PDAC患者中,1162例完成了COST问卷,1079例符合纳入标准。FT的患病率为23%(n = 245);37%的FT患者报告因费用问题未坚持服药。人口统计学因素和较差的体能状态与FT相关。与接受诱导、辅助或姑息治疗的患者相比,初治患者更有可能报告FT(P = 0.049)。经历FT的患者报告的QOL较差,中位数评分为5(四分位间距,4 - 7),而未经历FT的患者为8(四分位间距,6 - 9)。在调整人口统计学和临床因素后,这种关系仍然存在;FT的效应量(β = -1.5;95%置信区间,-1.1至-1.9)几乎是较差体能状态效应量(β = -0.8;95%置信区间,-1.3至-0.4)的两倍。

结论

在一个大型癌症中心,FT影响了近四分之一的PDAC患者,并且与较差的QOL和药物治疗不依从相关。有必要进行普遍筛查和干预以降低FT。将QOL作为终点的临床试验必须考虑到FT可能造成的混杂因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索