Furlong Teri M, Richardson Rick, McNally Gavan P
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Feb;128:7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
Establishing the neurocircuitry involved in inhibiting fear is important for understanding and treating anxiety disorders. To date, extinction procedures have been predominately used to examine the inhibition of learned fear, where fear is reduced to a conditioned stimulus (CS) by presenting it in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus (US). However, learned fear can also be reduced by habituation procedures where the US is presented in the absence of the CS. Here we used expression of the activity marker c-Fos in rats to compare the recruitment of several forebrain structures following fear habituation and extinction. Following fear conditioning where a tone CS was paired with a loud noise US, fear was then reduced the following day by either presentation of the CS or US alone (i.e. CS extinction or US habituation, respectively). This extinction and habituation training recruited several common structures, including infralimbic cortex, basolateral amygdala, midline thalamus and medial hypothalamus (orexin neurons). Moreover, this overlap was shared when examining the neural correlates of the expression of habituation and extinction, with common recruitment of infralimbic cortex and midline thalamus. However, there were also important differences. Specifically, acquisition of habituation was associated with greater recruitment of prelimbic cortex whereas expression of habituation was associated with greater recruitment of paraventricular thalamus. There was also less recruitment of central amygdala for habituation compared to extinction in the retention phase. These findings indicate that largely overlapping neurocircuitries underlie habituation and fear extinction and imply common mechanisms for reducing fear across different inhibitory treatments.
确定参与抑制恐惧的神经回路对于理解和治疗焦虑症至关重要。迄今为止,消退程序一直主要用于研究习得性恐惧的抑制,即在无条件刺激(US)不存在的情况下呈现条件刺激(CS),从而使恐惧降低。然而,习得性恐惧也可以通过习惯化程序来降低,即在CS不存在的情况下呈现US。在这里,我们利用大鼠中活性标记物c-Fos的表达来比较恐惧习惯化和消退后几个前脑结构的激活情况。在恐惧条件反射中,将音调CS与大声噪音US配对,然后在第二天通过单独呈现CS或US(即分别为CS消退或US习惯化)来降低恐惧。这种消退和习惯化训练激活了几个共同的结构,包括边缘下皮质、基底外侧杏仁核、中线丘脑和内侧下丘脑(食欲素神经元)。此外,在检查习惯化和消退表达的神经相关性时也存在这种重叠,边缘下皮质和中线丘脑被共同激活。然而,也存在重要差异。具体而言,习惯化的获得与前额叶皮质的更大激活有关,而习惯化的表达与室旁丘脑的更大激活有关。在保持阶段,与消退相比,习惯化时中央杏仁核的激活也较少。这些发现表明,习惯化和恐惧消退背后的神经回路在很大程度上重叠,这意味着在不同的抑制性治疗中减少恐惧的共同机制。