Luu Ngoc-Phuong, Pitts Samantha, Petty Brent, Sawyer Melinda D, Dennison-Himmelfarb Cheryl, Boonyasai Romsai Tony, Maruthur Nisa M
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31(4):417-25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3547-4. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
Most research on transitions of care has focused on the transition from acute to outpatient care. Little is known about the transition from outpatient to acute care. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the transition from outpatient to acute care, focusing on provider-to-provider communication and its impact on quality of care.
We searched the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for English-language articles describing direct communication between outpatient providers and acute care providers around patients presenting to the emergency department or admitted to the hospital. We conducted double, independent review of titles, abstracts, and full text articles. Conflicts were resolved by consensus. Included articles were abstracted using standardized forms. We maintained search results via Refworks (ProQuest, Bethesda, MD). Risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Downs' and Black's tool.
Of 4009 citations, twenty articles evaluated direct provider-to-provider communication around the outpatient to acute care transition. Most studies were cross-sectional (65%), conducted in the US (55%), and studied communication between primary care and inpatient providers (62%). Of three studies reporting on the association between communication and 30-day readmissions, none found a significant association; of these studies, only one reported a measure of association (adjusted OR for communication vs. no communication, 1.08; 95% CI 0.92-1.26).
The literature on provider-to-provider communication at the transition from outpatient to acute care is sparse and heterogeneous. Given the known importance of communication for other transitions of care, future studies are needed on provider-to-provider communication during this transition. Studies evaluating ideal methods for communication to reduce medical errors, utilization, and optimize patient satisfaction at this transition are especially needed.
大多数关于医疗护理过渡的研究都集中在从急性护理到门诊护理的过渡上。对于从门诊护理到急性护理的过渡了解甚少。我们对有关从门诊护理到急性护理过渡的文献进行了系统综述,重点关注提供者之间的沟通及其对护理质量的影响。
我们在MEDLINE、CINAHL、Scopus、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库中搜索了英文文章,这些文章描述了门诊提供者与急性护理提供者围绕急诊就诊或住院患者进行的直接沟通。我们对文章标题、摘要和全文进行了两轮独立评审。通过协商解决分歧。纳入的文章使用标准化表格进行摘要。我们通过Refworks(ProQuest,马里兰州贝塞斯达)维护搜索结果。使用Downs和Black工具的修改版评估偏倚风险。
在4009条引用中,有20篇文章评估了门诊到急性护理过渡期间提供者之间的直接沟通。大多数研究是横断面研究(65%),在美国进行(55%),并研究了初级护理与住院提供者之间的沟通(62%)。在三项报告沟通与30天再入院之间关联的研究中,没有一项发现显著关联;在这些研究中,只有一项报告了关联度测量值(沟通与无沟通的调整后比值比,1.08;95%置信区间0.92 - 1.26)。
关于从门诊护理到急性护理过渡期间提供者之间沟通的文献稀少且参差不齐。鉴于沟通对于其他护理过渡的已知重要性,需要对这一过渡期间提供者之间的沟通进行进一步研究。尤其需要开展研究来评估理想的沟通方法,以减少医疗差错、医疗资源利用并在此过渡期间优化患者满意度。