Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1166-1171. doi: 10.1037/pas0000258. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 28(10) of (see record 2016-36101-001). In the article, the third sentence of the Internal Consistency subsection of the Results section should read: Item 8, “Not being able to remember important parts of the trauma,” had an item–total correlation of .34, and Item 16, “Taking more risks or doing things that might cause you or others harm” had an item–total correlation of .44; the range of item–total correlations for the remaining 18 items was .62–.82, with an average of .70.”] The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM–5 (PDS–5), a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on diagnostic criteria of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Participants were 242 urban community residents, veterans, and college undergraduates recruited from 3 study sites who had experienced a DSM–5 Criterion A traumatic experience. The PDS–5 demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .95) and test–retest reliability (r = .90) and good convergent validity with the PTSD Checklist—Specific Version (r = .90) and the PTSD Symptom Scale—Interview Version for DSM–5 (PSSI–5; r = .85). The PDS–5 also showed good discriminant validity with the Beck Depression Inventory—II and the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory—Trait scale (all ZH > 3.05, ps < .01). There was 78% agreement between the PDS–5 and the PSSI–5. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded a cutoff score of 28 for identifying a probable PTSD diagnosis. The PDS–5 is a valid and reliable measure of DSM–5 PTSD symptomatology.
[勘误通知:本文在 (见记录 2016-36101-001)第 28(10)卷中报告了一篇勘误。在文章中,结果部分的内部一致性小节的第三句话应该是:第 8 项,“无法记住创伤的重要部分”,其项目总分相关系数为.34,第 16 项,“承担更多风险或做可能伤害自己或他人的事情”,其项目总分相关系数为.44;其余 18 项的项目总分相关系数范围为.62-.82,平均为.70。”] 本研究旨在评估基于《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)诊断标准的创伤后诊断量表(PDS-5)的心理测量特性,该量表是一种用于评估创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的自我报告测量工具。参与者为 242 名城市社区居民、退伍军人和大学生,他们来自 3 个研究地点,经历过 DSM-5 标准 A 创伤事件。PDS-5 表现出极好的内部一致性(α=.95)和重测信度(r=.90),与 PTSD 检查表-特定版本(r=.90)和 PTSD 症状量表-DSM-5 访谈版本(PSSI-5;r=.85)有良好的聚合效度。PDS-5 与贝克抑郁量表-第二版和状态-特质焦虑量表-特质量表(所有 ZH > 3.05,ps <.01)也有良好的区分效度。PDS-5 和 PSSI-5 之间有 78%的一致性。受试者工作特征分析得出一个用于识别可能 PTSD 诊断的截断分数为 28。PDS-5 是一种有效的、可靠的 DSM-5 PTSD 症状测量工具。