Goldin-Meadow Susan
University of Chicago.
Dev Rev. 2015 Dec 1;38:167-184. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.007.
Piaget was a master at observing the routine behaviors children produce as they go from knowing less to knowing more about at a task, and making inferences not only about how the children understood the task at each point, but also about how they progressed from one point to the next. In this paper, I examine a routine behavior that Piaget overlooked-the spontaneous gestures speakers produce as they explain their solutions to a problem. These gestures are not mere hand waving. They reflect ideas that the speaker has about the problem, often ideas that are not found in that speaker's talk. But gesture can do more than reflect ideas-it can also change them. In this sense, gesture behaves like any other action; both gesture and action on objects facilitate learning problems on which training was given. However, only gesture promotes transferring the knowledge gained to problems that require generalization. Gesture is, in fact, a special kind of action in that it represents the world rather than directly manipulating the world (gesture does not move objects around). The mechanisms by which gesture and action promote learning may therefore differ-gesture is able to highlight components of an action that promote abstract learning while leaving out details that could tie learning to a specific context. Because it is both an action and a representation, gesture can serve as a bridge between the two and thus be a powerful tool for learning abstract ideas.
皮亚杰擅长观察儿童在一项任务中从知之甚少到了解更多时所表现出的日常行为,并不仅对儿童在每个阶段如何理解任务进行推断,还对他们如何从一个阶段发展到下一个阶段进行推断。在本文中,我研究了一种皮亚杰忽略的日常行为——说话者在解释问题解决方案时自发做出的手势。这些手势并非只是挥舞手臂。它们反映了说话者对问题的看法,这些看法往往在说话者的言语中并未体现。但手势的作用不止于反映想法——它还能改变想法。从这个意义上说,手势的表现与其他任何行为无异;对手势和对物体的操作都有助于解决经过训练的学习问题。然而,只有手势能促进将所学知识迁移到需要进行概括的问题上。事实上,手势是一种特殊的行为,因为它代表世界而非直接操纵世界(手势不会移动周围的物体)。因此,手势和操作促进学习的机制可能不同——手势能够突出促进抽象学习的行为组成部分,同时忽略那些可能将学习与特定情境联系起来的细节。由于手势既是一种行为又是一种表征,它可以充当两者之间的桥梁,从而成为学习抽象概念的有力工具。