Suppr超能文献

健康男性大脑磷磁共振波谱(³¹PMRS)的pH测量——两种分析方法的比较

PH Measurements of the Brain Using Phosphorus Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ((31)PMRS) in Healthy Men - Comparison of Two Analysis Methods.

作者信息

Cichocka Monika, Kozub Justyna, Urbanik Andrzej

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.

出版信息

Pol J Radiol. 2015 Nov 21;80:509-14. doi: 10.12659/PJR.895178. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracellular pH provides information on homeostatic mechanisms in neurons and glial cells. The aim of this study was to define pH of the brain of male volunteers using phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((31)PMRS) and to compare two methods of calculating this value.

MATERIAL/METHODS: In this study, 35 healthy, young, male volunteers (mean age: 25 years) were examined by (31)PMRS in 1.5 T MR system (Signa Excite, GE). The FID CSI (Free Induction Decay Chemical Shift Imaging) sequence was used with the following parameters: TR=4000 ms, FA=90°, NEX=2. Volume of interest (VOI) was selected depending on the size of the volunteers' brain (11-14 cm(3), mean 11.53 cm(3)). Raw data were analyzed using SAGE (GE) software.

RESULTS

Based on the chemical shift of peaks in the (31)PMRS spectrum, intracellular pH was calculated using two equations. In both methods the mean pH was slightly alkaline (7.07 and 7.08). Results were compared with a t-test. Significant difference (p<0.05) was found between these two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The (31)PMRS method enables non-invasive in vivo measurements of pH. The choice of the calculation method is crucial for computing this value. Comparing the results obtained by different teams can be done in a fully credible way only if the calculations were performed using the same formula.

摘要

背景

细胞内pH值提供了有关神经元和神经胶质细胞稳态机制的信息。本研究的目的是使用磷磁共振波谱法((31)PMRS)确定男性志愿者大脑的pH值,并比较计算该值的两种方法。

材料/方法:在本研究中,35名健康、年轻的男性志愿者(平均年龄:25岁)在1.5T磁共振系统(Signa Excite,GE)中接受(31)PMRS检查。使用FID CSI(自由感应衰减化学位移成像)序列,参数如下:TR = 4000毫秒,FA = 90°,NEX = 2。根据志愿者大脑的大小选择感兴趣体积(VOI)(11 - 14立方厘米,平均11.53立方厘米)。使用SAGE(GE)软件分析原始数据。

结果

根据(31)PMRS谱中峰的化学位移,使用两个公式计算细胞内pH值。两种方法的平均pH值均略呈碱性(7.07和7.08)。结果用t检验进行比较。发现这两种方法之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。

结论

(31)PMRS方法能够对pH值进行非侵入性体内测量。计算方法的选择对于计算该值至关重要。只有在使用相同公式进行计算时,才能以完全可信的方式比较不同团队获得的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验