Suppr超能文献

50毫克/天度洛西汀与安慰剂用于重度抑郁症长期治疗的疗效:一项随机双盲试验

Efficacy of Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d Versus Placebo in the Long-Term Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

作者信息

Boyer Patrice, Vialet Cécile, Hwang Eunhee, Tourian Karen A

机构信息

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, and University Paris 7, Paris, France (Dr Boyer); Pfizer Global Research and Development, Paris, France (Ms Vialet); and Pfizer, Collegeville, Pennsylvania (Drs Hwang and Tourian). Dr Tourian is now with inVentiv Health Clinical, Princeton, New Jersey.

出版信息

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 Aug 27;17(4). doi: 10.4088/PCC.14m01711. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine long-term (11-month) antidepressant efficacy of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d across a broad range of clinical and functional outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder.

METHOD

Adult outpatients (≥ 18 years) with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV criteria) and a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) total score ≥ 20 at screening and baseline who responded to 8 weeks of open-label desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and had a continuing stable response through week 20 were randomly assigned to receive placebo or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in a 6-month, double-blind, randomized withdrawal period. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the HDRS-17, 6-item HDRS, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Ilness and -Improvement (CGI-S, CGI-I). Health outcomes included the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and the World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The trial was conducted from June 2009 to March 2011 at 87 study sites in 14 countries worldwide.

RESULTS

Of 874 patients enrolled in open-label treatment, 548 patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind placebo (n = 276) or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (n = 272). At the end of the 6-month double-blind treatment, improvements in depressive symptoms were better maintained among the desvenlafaxine- than placebo-treated patients on all efficacy endpoints (all P ≤ .001); in the desvenlafaxine group, 21.8% (vs 42.9% in the placebo group) had CGI-I ratings of 5, 6, and 7 (minimally worse/much worse/very much worse), and 74.4% met criteria for remission (placebo: 54.2%). WPAI and WHO-5 scores indicated significantly better productivity and well-being with continued desvenlafaxine (vs placebo, P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d maintained improvements in major depressive disorder among adult outpatients who exhibited a stable therapeutic response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00887224.

摘要

目的

探讨50毫克/天去甲文拉法辛在广泛的临床和功能结局方面对重度抑郁症患者的长期(11个月)抗抑郁疗效。

方法

患有重度抑郁症(符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版标准)的成年门诊患者(≥18岁),在筛查和基线时17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)总分≥20,对8周的50毫克/天开放标签去甲文拉法辛有反应且在第20周时持续有稳定反应,在6个月的双盲随机撤药期被随机分配接受安慰剂或50毫克/天去甲文拉法辛。使用HDRS-17、6项HDRS以及临床总体印象-疾病严重程度和-改善情况(CGI-S、CGI-I)评估抑郁症状。健康结局包括工作效率和活动受损(WPAI)问卷以及世界卫生组织5项幸福指数(WHO-5)。该试验于2009年6月至2011年3月在全球14个国家的87个研究地点进行。

结果

在874名参加开放标签治疗的患者中,548名患者被随机分配接受双盲安慰剂(n = 276)或50毫克/天去甲文拉法辛(n = 272)。在6个月双盲治疗结束时,在所有疗效终点上,去甲文拉法辛治疗组的抑郁症状改善情况比安慰剂治疗组维持得更好(所有P≤0.001);在去甲文拉法辛组中,21.8%(安慰剂组为42.9%)的CGI-I评分为5、6和7(稍有恶化/恶化很多/恶化非常多),74.4%达到缓解标准(安慰剂组为54.2%)。WPAI和WHO-5评分表明持续使用去甲文拉法辛时生产力和幸福感明显更好(与安慰剂相比,P≤0.001)。

结论

对于表现出稳定治疗反应的成年门诊重度抑郁症患者,50毫克/天去甲文拉法辛的长期治疗可维持病情改善。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00887224。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d Versus Placebo in the Long-Term Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 Aug 27;17(4). doi: 10.4088/PCC.14m01711. eCollection 2015.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Practical pathway for the management of depression in the workplace: a Canadian perspective.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 5;14:1207653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1207653. eCollection 2023.
3
Real-World Evidence from the Integrative Medicine Primary Care Trial (IMPACT): Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes at Baseline and 12-Month Follow-Up.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Jun 26;2019:8595409. doi: 10.1155/2019/8595409. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
High-dose desvenlafaxine in outpatients with major depressive disorder.
CNS Spectr. 2012 Sep;17(3):121-30. doi: 10.1017/S1092852912000508. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
3
A 10-month, open-label evaluation of desvenlafaxine in outpatients with major depressive disorder.
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(2). doi: 10.4088/PCC.10m00977blu.
6
International consensus statement on major depressive disorder.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71 Suppl E1:e08. doi: 10.4088/JCP.9058se1c.08gry.
7
Major depressive disorder treatment guidelines in America and Europe.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71 Suppl E1:e04. doi: 10.4088/JCP.9058se1c.04gry.
8
Desvenlafaxine for the prevention of relapse in major depressive disorder: results of a randomized trial.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;30(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181c94c4d.
9
Residual symptoms after remission of major depressive disorder with citalopram and risk of relapse: a STAR*D report.
Psychol Med. 2010 Jan;40(1):41-50. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709006011. Epub 2009 May 22.
10
Course and outcome of depressive disorders in primary care: a prospective 18-month study.
Psychol Med. 2009 Oct;39(10):1697-707. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709005182. Epub 2009 Mar 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验