Suppr超能文献

在有症状的抑郁患者中改善症状和功能:去甲文拉法辛与安慰剂的双盲临床试验。

Symptomatic and functional improvement in employed depressed patients: a double-blind clinical trial of desvenlafaxine versus placebo.

机构信息

Emory University College of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;31(5):569-76. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31822c0a68.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This is the first study to assess the efficacy of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) for improving depressive symptoms and functioning exclusively in employed patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Gainfully employed (≥20 h/wk) male and female outpatients with MDD were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d or placebo. Analysis of covariance was used to compare differences in week 12 adjusted mean changes from baseline on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D₁₇) (primary outcome) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) (key secondary outcome) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. A predefined, modified ITT population (ie, those in the ITT population with baseline HAM-D₁₇ ≥20) was also analyzed. Tolerability was assessed by recording adverse events and change on the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale.

RESULTS

Baseline HAM-D₁₇ scores for desvenlafaxine (n = 285) and placebo (n = 142) were 22.0 and 21.8, whereas baseline SDS scores were 19.8 and 20.4. Adjusted mean differences between desvenlafaxine and placebo were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-3.46; P = 0.002) on the HAM-D₁₇ and 1.3 (95% CI, -0.09 to 2.76; P = 0.067) on the SDS. For the modified ITT sample, desvenlafaxine (n = 208) and placebo (n = 102), baseline HAM-D₁₇ scores were 23.8 and 23.9; the SDS baseline scores were 20.1 and 20.8. Mean differences were 2.6 (95% CI, 0.93-4.22; P = 0.002) on the HAM-D₁₇ and 2.1 (95% CI, 0.36-3.76; P = 0.017) on the SDS. Adverse events and Arizona Sexual Experience Scale scores were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d was efficacious for treating MDD in gainfully employed adults. Between-group differences on the SDS narrowly missed statistical significance in the ITT population alone, but the totality of data suggests functional improvements with active treatment.

摘要

目的

这是第一项评估去甲文拉法辛(作为去甲文拉法辛琥珀酸盐给药)改善抑郁症状和功能的疗效的研究,专门针对有重度抑郁症(MDD)的在职患者。

方法

有酬(每周工作≥20 小时)的男性和女性门诊 MDD 患者被随机分配(2:1 比例)接受为期 12 周的双盲治疗,接受去甲文拉法辛 50mg/d 或安慰剂。使用协方差分析比较意向治疗(ITT)人群基线 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D₁₇)(主要结局)和 Sheehan 残疾量表(SDS)(关键次要结局)的第 12 周调整后的平均变化。还分析了一个预设的、修改后的 ITT 人群(即,基线 HAM-D₁₇≥20 的 ITT 人群)。通过记录不良事件和亚利桑那性经验量表的变化来评估耐受性。

结果

去甲文拉法辛(n=285)和安慰剂(n=142)的基线 HAM-D₁₇ 评分分别为 22.0 和 21.8,而基线 SDS 评分分别为 19.8 和 20.4。去甲文拉法辛与安慰剂的调整平均差异分别为 HAM-D₁₇ 上的 2.1(95%置信区间[CI],0.78-3.46;P=0.002)和 SDS 上的 1.3(95%CI,-0.09 至 2.76;P=0.067)。对于修改后的 ITT 样本,去甲文拉法辛(n=208)和安慰剂(n=102)的基线 HAM-D₁₇ 评分分别为 23.8 和 23.9;SDS 的基线评分分别为 20.1 和 20.8。HAM-D₁₇ 的平均差异为 2.6(95%CI,0.93-4.22;P=0.002),SDS 的平均差异为 2.1(95%CI,0.36-3.76;P=0.017)。两组之间的不良事件和亚利桑那性经验量表评分相当。

结论

去甲文拉法辛 50mg/d 对有酬成年 MDD 患者有效。单独在 ITT 人群中,SDS 上的组间差异接近统计学意义,但总的数据表明积极治疗可改善功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验