Damman Kevin, Kjekshus John, Wikstrand John, Cleland John G F, Komajda Michel, Wedel Hans, Waagstein Finn, McMurray John J V
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
University of Groningen, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;18(3):328-36. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.462. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
We aimed to study the relationships of loop diuretic dose with renal function and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (HF).
Loop diuretic dose at baseline was recorded in patients included in the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA). The relationship to change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time and to the first occurrence of the composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization owing to HF was examined in propensity score matched cohorts. Of the 5011 patients, 2550, 745, and 449 were receiving >80 mg (high), 41-80 mg (medium) and ≤40 mg (low) of loop diuretics in furosemide equivalent daily dosages, respectively, which were used to assemble 229, 385, and 1045 pairs of propensity-matched high, medium, and low dose cohorts. Compared with matched no loop diuretic groups, eGFR declined 0.3 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 0.3 and 1.2 ± 0.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year in the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups, respectively. Compared with matched no loop diuretic groups, hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence intervals) for outcome associated with low-, medium- and high-dose groups were 1.71 (1.41-2.06), 1.99 (1.50-2.64), and 2.94 (1.95-4.41), respectively. Higher loop diuretic dose was particularly associated with increased risk for hospitalization owing to HF: HR 4.80 (2.75-8.37), P < 0.001.
The use of loop diuretics was associated with a slightly greater rate of decline in eGFR, which did not vary significantly by diuretic dose.Loop diuretic dose was associated with higher risks of (CV) mortality and predominantly hospitalization owing to HF, which appeared to be higher among those receiving higher daily doses.
我们旨在研究慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者中袢利尿剂剂量与肾功能及临床结局之间的关系。
在心力衰竭罗苏伐他汀多国对照试验(CORONA)纳入的患者中记录基线时的袢利尿剂剂量。在倾向评分匹配队列中,研究其与估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)随时间变化以及与心血管(CV)死亡或因HF住院的复合结局首次发生之间的关系。5011例患者中,分别有2550例、745例和449例接受袢利尿剂,以速尿等效日剂量计,分别为>80mg(高剂量)、41 - 80mg(中剂量)和≤40mg(低剂量),用于组建229对、385对和1045对倾向匹配的高、中、低剂量队列。与匹配的未使用袢利尿剂组相比,低、中、高剂量组的eGFR分别下降0.3±0.2、0.3±0.3和1.2±0.5mL/min/1.73m²/年。与匹配的未使用袢利尿剂组相比,低、中、高剂量组结局的风险比(HR)(95%置信区间)分别为1.71(1.41 - 2.06)、1.99(1.50 - 2.64)和2.94(1.95 - 4.41)。更高的袢利尿剂剂量尤其与因HF住院风险增加相关:HR为4.80(2.75 - 8.37),P<0.001。
使用袢利尿剂与eGFR下降速率略有增加相关,且这种下降速率在不同利尿剂剂量之间无显著差异。袢利尿剂剂量与(CV)死亡率及主要因HF住院的较高风险相关,在接受较高日剂量的患者中似乎更高。