Zhang Lu-Ning, Xiao Wei-Wei, Xi Shao-Yan, OuYang Pu-Yun, You Kai-Yun, Zeng Zhi-Fan, Ding Pei-Rong, Zhang Hui-Zhong, Pan Zhi-Zhong, Xu Rui-Hua, Gao Yuan-Hong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Pathological Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Oncotarget. 2016 Feb 2;7(5):6335-44. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6656.
Tumor deposits (TDs) were reported to be poor prognoses in colorectal carcinoma, but the significance in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (T3-4/N+) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) and surgery is unclear. Since adjuvant chemotherapy showed no benefit for LARC following neo-CRT, it is of great value to investigate whether TDs can identify the subgroup of patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Between 2004 and 2012, 310 LARC patients following neo-CRT and surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox models.
TDs-positive patients showed adverse OS, DFS and DMFS (all P ≤ 0.001), but not LRFS (P = 0.273). In multivariate analysis, TDs continued to be associated with poor OS (HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.32-4.4, P = 0.004) and DFS (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.21-3.27, P = 0.007), but not DMFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 0.97-3.20, P = 0.061) or LRFS (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.58-5.85, P = 0.298). Among TDs-positive patients, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS (P = 0.045) and DMFS (P = 0.026), but not DFS (P = 0.127) or LRFS (P = 0.862).
TDs are predictive of poor survival in LARC after neo-CRT. Fortunately, TDs-positive patients appear to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
据报道,肿瘤沉积物(TDs)在结直肠癌中预后较差,但在新辅助放化疗(neo-CRT)及手术治疗后的局部晚期直肠癌(LARC,T3-4/N+)中的意义尚不清楚。由于辅助化疗对新辅助放化疗后的LARC患者并无益处,因此研究TDs能否识别出可能从辅助化疗中获益的患者亚组具有重要价值。
回顾性分析2004年至2012年间310例行新辅助放化疗及手术的LARC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法、对数秩检验和Cox模型评估总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、无远处转移生存期(DMFS)和无局部复发生存期(LRFS)。
TDs阳性患者的OS、DFS和DMFS较差(均P≤0.001),但LRFS无差异(P = 0.273)。多因素分析中,TDs仍与较差的OS(HR = 2.44,95%CI 1.32-4.4,P = 0.004)和DFS(HR = 1.99,95%CI 1.21-3.27,P = 0.007)相关,但与DMFS(HR = 1.77,95%CI 0.97-3.20,P = 0.061)或LRFS(HR = 1.85,95%CI 0.58-5.85,P = 0.298)无关。在TDs阳性患者中,辅助化疗显著改善了OS(P = 0.045)和DMFS(P = 0.026),但对DFS(P = 0.127)或LRFS(P = 0.862)无改善。
TDs可预测新辅助放化疗后LARC患者的不良生存情况。幸运的是,TDs阳性患者似乎可从辅助化疗中获益。