Irurtzun Aritz
CNRS, IKER (UMR 5478) Bayonne, France.
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 9;6:1817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01817. eCollection 2015.
In recent research (Boeckx and Benítez-Burraco, 2014a,b) have advanced the hypothesis that our species-specific language-ready brain should be understood as the outcome of developmental changes that occurred in our species after the split from Neanderthals-Denisovans, which resulted in a more globular braincase configuration in comparison to our closest relatives, who had elongated endocasts. According to these authors, the development of a globular brain is an essential ingredient for the language faculty and in particular, it is the centrality occupied by the thalamus in a globular brain that allows its modulatory or regulatory role, essential for syntactico-semantic computations. Their hypothesis is that the syntactico-semantic capacities arise in humans as a consequence of a process of globularization, which significantly takes place postnatally (cf. Neubauer et al., 2010). In this paper, I show that Boeckx and Benítez-Burraco's hypothesis makes an interesting developmental prediction regarding the path of language acquisition: it teases apart the onset of phonological acquisition and the onset of syntactic acquisition (the latter starting significantly later, after globularization). I argue that this hypothesis provides a developmental rationale for the prosodic bootstrapping hypothesis of language acquisition (cf. i.a. Gleitman and Wanner, 1982; Mehler et al., 1988, et seq.; Gervain and Werker, 2013), which claim that prosodic cues are employed for syntactic parsing. The literature converges in the observation that a large amount of such prosodic cues (in particular, rhythmic cues) are already acquired before the completion of the globularization phase, which paves the way for the premises of the prosodic bootstrapping hypothesis, allowing babies to have a rich knowledge of the prosody of their target language before they can start parsing the primary linguistic data syntactically.
在最近的研究中(博克斯和贝尼特斯 - 布拉科,2014a,b)提出了这样一个假说:我们物种特有的具备语言能力的大脑应被理解为在与尼安德特人 - 丹尼索瓦人分化后,我们物种中发生的发育变化的结果,与我们那些脑壳内模拉长的近亲相比,这导致了更球形的脑壳结构。根据这些作者的观点,球形大脑的发育是语言能力的一个关键要素,特别是丘脑在球形大脑中占据的中心位置使其能够发挥调节作用,这对于句法 - 语义计算至关重要。他们的假说是,句法 - 语义能力在人类中产生是球形化过程的结果,这一过程主要发生在出生后(参见诺伊鲍尔等人,2010)。在本文中,我表明博克斯和贝尼特斯 - 布拉科的假说对语言习得路径做出了一个有趣的发育预测:它区分了语音习得的开始和句法习得的开始(后者在球形化之后显著延迟开始)。我认为这个假说为语言习得的韵律引导假说(参见例如格利特曼和万纳,1982;梅勒等人,1988及后续;热尔万和韦尔克,2013)提供了一个发育原理,该假说声称韵律线索被用于句法解析。文献一致观察到,大量这样的韵律线索(特别是节奏线索)在球形化阶段完成之前就已经被习得,这为韵律引导假说的前提铺平了道路,使婴儿在能够开始句法解析主要语言数据之前,就对其目标语言的韵律有丰富的知识。