相似文献
1
Editorial: Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 2;6:1872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01872. eCollection 2015.
2
The psychology of Bayesian reasoning.
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 9;5:1144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01144. eCollection 2014.
3
Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal.
Br J Psychol. 2002 May;93(Pt 2):169-77. doi: 10.1348/000712602162517.
4
Probabilistic reasoning in obsessive-compulsive and delusional disorders.
Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):199-208. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004175.
5
Dependencies in evidential reports: The case for informational advantages.
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104343. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104343. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Feb;32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000284.
7
Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):972-978. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1161-z.
8
Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Aug;96:54-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 31;6:340. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00340. eCollection 2015.
10
Processing Probability Information in Nonnumerical Settings - Teachers' Bayesian and Non-bayesian Strategies During Diagnostic Judgment.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 3;11:678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00678. eCollection 2020.
引用本文的文献
1
Previous beliefs affect Bayesian reasoning in conditions fostering gist comprehension.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1819-1835. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01435-1. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
2
Perspectives on the 2 × 2 Matrix: Solving Semantically Distinct Problems Based on a Shared Structure of Binary Contingencies.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 9;11:567817. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567817. eCollection 2020.
3
Public's understanding of swab test results for SARS-CoV-2: an online behavioural experiment during the April 2020 lockdown.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 17;11(1):e043925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043925.
4
Different Visualizations Cause Different Strategies When Dealing With Bayesian Situations.
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 21;11:1897. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01897. eCollection 2020.
5
Editorial: Judgment and Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Perspectives.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 2;10:1506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01506. eCollection 2019.
6
From reading numbers to seeing ratios: a benefit of icons for risk comprehension.
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1808-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1041-4. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
7
Visualizing the Bayesian 2-test case: The effect of tree diagrams on medical decision making.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 27;13(3):e0195029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195029. eCollection 2018.
8
The Impact of Visualizing Nested Sets. An Empirical Study on Tree Diagrams and Unit Squares.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 6;7:2026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02026. eCollection 2016.
本文引用的文献
1
Natural frequencies improve Bayesian reasoning in simple and complex inference tasks.
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 14;6:1473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01473. eCollection 2015.
2
Doctor, what does my positive test mean? From Bayesian textbook tasks to personalized risk communication.
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 17;6:1327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01327. eCollection 2015.
3
Effects of visualizing statistical information - an empirical study on tree diagrams and 2 × 2 tables.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 26;6:1186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01186. eCollection 2015.
4
Bayesian probability estimates are not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes' rule in elementary situations.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 17;6:1194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01194. eCollection 2015.
5
Rationality, the Bayesian standpoint, and the Monty-Hall problem.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 11;6:1168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01168. eCollection 2015.
6
On Bayesian problem-solving: helping Bayesians solve simple Bayesian word problems.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 10;6:1141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01141. eCollection 2015.
7
Toward an ecological analysis of Bayesian inferences: how task characteristics influence responses.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 4;6:939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00939. eCollection 2015.
8
Comprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solving.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 27;6:938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00938. eCollection 2015.
9
Visual aids improve diagnostic inferences and metacognitive judgment calibration.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 16;6:932. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00932. eCollection 2015.
10
Natural frequencies facilitate diagnostic inferences of managers.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 22;6:642. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00642. eCollection 2015.
Zotero 插件