在贝叶斯变量选择优于基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)的群体基因组预测场景中。

Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.

作者信息

van den Berg S, Calus M P L, Meuwissen T H E, Wientjes Y C J

机构信息

Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, 6700, AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, 6700, AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Genet. 2015 Dec 23;16:146. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0305-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of information across populations is an attractive approach to increase the accuracy of genomic prediction for numerically small populations. However, accuracies of across population genomic prediction, in which reference and selection individuals are from different populations, are currently disappointing. It has been shown for within population genomic prediction that Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP models when the number of QTL underlying the trait is low. Therefore, our objective was to identify across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP in terms of prediction accuracy. In this study, high density genotype information of 1033 Holstein Friesian, 105 Groningen White Headed, and 147 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cows were used. Phenotypes were simulated using two changing variables: (1) the number of QTL underlying the trait (3000, 300, 30, 3), and (2) the correlation between allele substitution effects of QTL across populations, i.e. the genetic correlation of the simulated trait between the populations (1.0, 0.8, 0.4).

RESULTS

The accuracy obtained by the Bayesian variable selection model was depending on the number of QTL underlying the trait, with a higher accuracy when the number of QTL was lower. This trend was more pronounced for across population genomic prediction than for within population genomic prediction. It was shown that Bayesian variable selection models have an advantage over GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was small. This advantage disappeared when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was large. The point where the accuracy of Bayesian variable selection and GBLUP became similar was approximately the point where the number of QTL was equal to the number of independent chromosome segments (M e ) across the populations.

CONCLUSION

Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the trait is smaller than M e . Across populations, M e is considerably larger than within populations. So, it is more likely to find a number of QTL underlying a trait smaller than M e across populations than within population. Therefore Bayesian variable selection models can help to improve the accuracy of across population genomic prediction.

摘要

背景

跨群体使用信息是提高小数量群体基因组预测准确性的一种有吸引力的方法。然而,参考群体和选择群体来自不同群体的跨群体基因组预测的准确性目前并不理想。对于群体内基因组预测,已有研究表明,当性状的数量性状位点(QTL)数量较少时,贝叶斯变量选择模型优于基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)模型。因此,我们的目标是确定在哪些跨群体基因组预测场景中,贝叶斯变量选择模型在预测准确性方面优于GBLUP。在本研究中,使用了1033头荷斯坦弗里生牛、105头格罗宁根白头牛和147头默兹-莱茵-伊塞尔牛的高密度基因型信息。使用两个变化变量模拟表型:(1)性状的QTL数量(3000、300、30、3),以及(2)群体间QTL的等位基因替代效应之间的相关性,即群体间模拟性状的遗传相关性(1.0、0.8、0.4)。

结果

贝叶斯变量选择模型获得的准确性取决于性状的QTL数量,QTL数量越少准确性越高。这种趋势在跨群体基因组预测中比在群体内基因组预测中更为明显。结果表明,当模拟性状的QTL数量较少时,贝叶斯变量选择模型优于GBLUP。当模拟性状的QTL数量较多时,这种优势消失。贝叶斯变量选择和GBLUP准确性变得相似的点大约是QTL数量等于群体中独立染色体片段数量(Me)的点。

结论

当性状的QTL数量小于Me时,贝叶斯变量选择模型优于GBLUP。在跨群体中,Me比群体内大得多。因此,与群体内相比,在跨群体中更有可能找到数量小于Me的性状QTL。因此,贝叶斯变量选择模型有助于提高跨群体基因组预测的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0dc/4690391/966afd935db4/12863_2015_305_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索