Yin Chang, Shi Haoran, Zhou Peng, Wang Yuwei, Tao Xuzhe, Yin Zongjun, Zhang Xiaodong, Liu Yang
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 4;14(7):1098. doi: 10.3390/ani14071098.
The need for sufficient reference population data poses a significant challenge in breeding programs aimed at improving pig farming on a small to medium scale. To overcome this hurdle, investigating the advantages of combing reference populations of varying sizes is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). Genomic selection (GS) in populations with limited reference data can be optimized by combining populations of the same breed or related breeds. This study focused on understanding the effect of combing different reference group sizes on the accuracy of GS for determining the growth effectiveness and percentage of lean meat in Yorkshire pigs. Specifically, our study investigated two important traits: the age at 100 kg live weight (AGE100) and the backfat thickness at 100 kg live weight (BF100). This research assessed the efficiency of genomic prediction (GP) using different GEBV models across three Yorkshire populations with varying genetic backgrounds. The GeneSeek 50K GGP porcine high-density array was used for genotyping. A total of 2295 Yorkshire pigs were included, representing three Yorkshire pig populations with different genetic backgrounds-295 from Danish (small) lines from Huaibei City, Anhui Province, 500 from Canadian (medium) lines from Lixin County, Anhui Province, and 1500 from American (large) lines from Shanghai. To evaluate the impact of different population combination scenarios on the GS accuracy, three approaches were explored: (1) combining all three populations for prediction, (2) combining two populations to predict the third, and (3) predicting each population independently. Five GEBV models, including three Bayesian models (BayesA, BayesB, and BayesC), the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model, and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) were implemented through 20 repetitions of five-fold cross-validation (CV). The results indicate that predicting one target population using the other two populations yielded the highest accuracy, providing a novel approach for improving the genomic selection accuracy in Yorkshire pigs. In this study, it was found that using different populations of the same breed to predict small- and medium-sized herds might be effective in improving the GEBV. This investigation highlights the significance of incorporating population combinations in genetic models for predicting the breeding value, particularly for pig farmers confronted with resource limitations.
在旨在改善中小规模养猪业的育种计划中,获取足够的参考群体数据是一项重大挑战。为克服这一障碍,研究不同规模参考群体相结合的优势对于提高基因组估计育种值(GEBV)的准确性至关重要。通过合并同一品种或相关品种的群体,可以优化参考数据有限的群体中的基因组选择(GS)。本研究聚焦于了解合并不同参考群体规模对大白猪生长性能和瘦肉率GS准确性的影响。具体而言,我们的研究调查了两个重要性状:100千克活重时的年龄(AGE100)和100千克活重时的背膘厚度(BF100)。本研究评估了在三个具有不同遗传背景的大白猪群体中使用不同GEBV模型进行基因组预测(GP)的效率。使用GeneSeek 50K GGP猪高密度芯片进行基因分型。共纳入2295头大白猪,代表三个具有不同遗传背景的大白猪群体——来自安徽省淮北市丹麦(小)系的295头、来自安徽省利辛县加拿大(中)系的500头以及来自上海美国(大)系的1500头。为评估不同群体组合方案对GS准确性的影响,探索了三种方法:(1)合并所有三个群体进行预测;(2)合并两个群体预测第三个群体;(3)独立预测每个群体。通过五次重复的五重交叉验证(CV),实施了五个GEBV模型,包括三个贝叶斯模型(BayesA、BayesB和BayesC)、基因组最佳线性无偏预测(GBLUP)模型和单步GBLUP(ssGBLUP)。结果表明,使用另外两个群体预测一个目标群体的准确性最高,为提高大白猪的基因组选择准确性提供了一种新方法。在本研究中,发现使用同一品种的不同群体预测中小型猪群可能对提高GEBV有效。这项调查突出了在预测育种值的遗传模型中纳入群体组合的重要性,特别是对于面临资源限制的养猪户而言。