Safigholi Habib, Song William Y, Meigooni Ali S
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):219–227. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5407.
Several different applicators have been designed for treatment of skin cancers, such as scalp, hand, and legs using Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy sources (IR-HDRS), miniature electronic brachytherapy sources (eBT), and external electron beam radiation therapy (EEBRT). Although, all of these methodologies may deliver the desired radiation dose to the skin, but the dose to the underlying bone may become the limiting factor for selection of the optimum treatment technique. In this project, dose to the underlying bone has been evaluated as a function of the radiation type, thickness of the bone, and thickness of the soft tissue on top of bone, assuming the same radiation dose delivery to the skin. These evaluations are performed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation technique with MCNP5 code. The results of these investigations indicate that, for delivery of the same skin dose with a 50keV eBT, 4 MeV or 6 MeV EEBRT techniques, the average doses received by the underlying bones are 5.31, 2, or 1.75 times the dose received from IR-HDRS technique, respectively. These investigations indicate that, for the treatment of skin cancer condition with bone immediately beneath skin, the eBT technique may not be the most suitable technique, as it may lead to excessive bone dose relative to IR-HDRS and 6 MeV or 4 MeV electron beams.
已经设计了几种不同的施源器,用于使用铱 - 192高剂量率近距离放射治疗源(IR - HDRS)、微型电子近距离放射治疗源(eBT)和外照射电子束放射治疗(EEBRT)来治疗皮肤癌,如头皮、手部和腿部的皮肤癌。尽管所有这些方法都可以向皮肤提供所需的辐射剂量,但对深层骨骼的剂量可能会成为选择最佳治疗技术的限制因素。在本项目中,假设向皮肤输送相同的辐射剂量,已根据辐射类型、骨骼厚度以及骨骼上方软组织的厚度来评估深层骨骼的剂量。这些评估是使用带有MCNP5代码的蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟技术进行的。这些研究结果表明,对于使用50keV的eBT、4MeV或6MeV的EEBRT技术输送相同的皮肤剂量,深层骨骼所接受的平均剂量分别是从IR - HDRS技术所接受剂量的5.31倍、2倍或1.75倍。这些研究表明,对于治疗皮肤下方紧邻骨骼的皮肤癌情况,eBT技术可能不是最合适的技术,因为相对于IR - HDRS以及6MeV或4MeV电子束,它可能会导致骨骼剂量过高。