Qian Dong, Lu Zipeng, Jackson Richard, Wu Junli, Liu Xinchun, Cai Baobao, Wu Pengfei, Yin Jie, Xu Qingcheng, Xu Dong, Peng Yunpeng, Jiang Kuirong, Miao Yi
Pancreas Center, Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Cancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, UK.
Pancreatology. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of the most troublesome complications after classical pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving PD. Whether the route of gastroenteric reconstruction has any influence on DGE remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different types of gastroenteric anastomosis on DGE after PD/PPPD.
A systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) was performed to identify eligible studies. Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was utilized to evaluate the quality of included studies. The primary outcome was DGE incidence rate. Further outcomes included mortality, morbidity, and other operation related events. Random-effect or fix-effect models were used as appropriate.
Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including a total of 530 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Based on these studies, no difference was found in DGE incidence between antecolic and retrocolic groups (relative risk [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.32; P = 0.41). Mortality, morbidity, and operation related events were not significantly different between groups.
Results of the meta-analysis reveal that DGE occurrence is not affected by route of gastroenteric anastomosis. Anastomosis approach should be chosen according to the surgeons' preference.
胃排空延迟(DGE)是经典胰十二指肠切除术(PD)或保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术(PPPD)后最棘手的并发症之一。胃肠重建途径对DGE是否有影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨不同类型的胃肠吻合术对PD/PPPD术后DGE的影响。
对文献数据库(Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science)进行系统检索,以确定符合条件的研究。采用Cochrane协作网的偏倚风险评估工具来评估纳入研究的质量。主要结局是DGE发生率。进一步的结局包括死亡率、发病率和其他与手术相关的事件。根据情况使用随机效应或固定效应模型。
共纳入5项随机对照试验(RCT),包括530例患者并进行分析。基于这些研究,结肠前组和结肠后组的DGE发生率无差异(相对风险[RR],0.82;95%置信区间[CI],0.51 - 1.32;P = 0.41)。两组间的死亡率、发病率和手术相关事件无显著差异。
荟萃分析结果显示,DGE的发生不受胃肠吻合途径的影响。应根据外科医生的偏好选择吻合方式。