Hand Therapy Unit Head, Sydney Hospital.
School of Physiotherapy, Western Sydney University.
J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
Are 6 weeks of synergistic wrist and finger exercises with the metacarpophalangeal joint constrained in an orthosis (constrained exercises) more effective than traditional finger exercises with the metacarpophalangeal joint unconstrained (unconstrained exercises) after open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal phalangeal fracture in terms of impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction at 6 and 12 weeks?
Randomised, parallel-group trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded outcome assessors.
Sixty-six participants within 1 week of open reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures.
The experimental group carried out 6 weeks of synergistic wrist and finger exercises with the metacarpophalangeal joint constrained, whilst the control group carried out finger exercises with the metacarpophalangeal joint unconstrained, as part of a comprehensive rehabilitation program.
The primary outcomes were: active proximal interphalangeal joint extension of the injured finger, total active range of motion, and strength. Secondary outcomes were: pain, difficulty with specific hand activity and difficulty with usual hand activity. A blinded assessor measured outcomes at Weeks 1, 6 and 12.
By Week 6, there were no significant between-group differences in improvement for: active proximal interphalangeal joint extension (MD 2 deg, 95% CI -3 to 7); total active finger range of motion (MD 0 deg, 95% CI -21 to 22); strength (MD -2kg, 95% CI -8 to 4); pain (MD 1/50, 95% CI -3 to 5); difficulty with specific hand activity (MD 2/60, 95% CI -3 to 8); or difficulty with usual hand activity (MD 0/40, 95% CI -4 to 3). By Week 12, there were also no significant between-group differences in any outcome.
Constrained and unconstrained exercises has similar effects after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fracture.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12610000294055).
在掌指关节用矫形器固定(约束运动)的协同手腕和手指 6 周运动与掌指关节未固定(非约束运动)的传统手指运动相比,在开放性复位和内固定近节指骨骨折后 6 周和 12 周时,在损伤、活动受限和参与受限方面是否更有效?
随机、平行组试验,隐匿分组,意向治疗分析和盲法结局评估者。
开放性复位和内固定近节指骨骨折后 1 周内的 66 名参与者。
实验组进行 6 周的协同手腕和手指运动,掌指关节受约束,而对照组进行掌指关节不受约束的手指运动,作为综合康复计划的一部分。
主要结局为:受伤手指的主动近指间关节伸展,总主动活动范围和力量。次要结局为:疼痛、特定手部活动困难和日常手部活动困难。盲法评估者在第 1、6 和 12 周测量结局。
到第 6 周时,两组之间在以下方面没有显著的改善差异:主动近指间关节伸展(MD 2 度,95%CI-3 至 7);总手指主动活动范围(MD 0 度,95%CI-21 至 22);力量(MD-2kg,95%CI-8 至 4);疼痛(MD 1/50,95%CI-3 至 5);特定手部活动困难(MD 2/60,95%CI-3 至 8);或日常手部活动困难(MD 0/40,95%CI-4 至 3)。到第 12 周时,两组在任何结局上也没有显著差异。
在开放性复位和内固定近节指骨骨折后,约束运动和非约束运动具有相似的效果。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册(ACTRN12610000294055)。