Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中原位加固缝线的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

The efficacy of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

Relevant articles published in English (up to July 25, 2015) were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge. The outcomes of staple line hemorrhage and leakage, overall complications, operative time were pooled. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were performed using Stata 13.1 software.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials involving 791 patients (453 cases and 338 controls) were analyzed. Compared to performing no reinforcement, staple line reinforcement was associated with a lower risk of staple line hemorrhage (RR = 0.609, 95%CI = 0.439-0.846, P = 0.003) and overall complications (RR = 0.673, 95%CI = 0.507-0.892, P = 0.006). No significant difference was observed regarding postoperative leakage (RR = 0.654, 95%CI = 0.275-1.555, P = 0.337). Oversewing of the staple line took longer operative time (WMD = 13.211, 95%CI = 6.192-20.229, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Staple line reinforcement using buttressing or roofing materials could reduce staple line hemorrhage and overall complications. No obvious advantages of oversewing the staple line were found and it took longer operative time. No significant reduction in leak rate was evidenced after reinforcement.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估腹腔镜袖状胃切除术时加固吻合口的效果。

方法

通过检索 PubMed、Embase、Web of Knowledge,检索截至 2015 年 7 月 25 日发表的英文相关文章。汇总吻合口出血和漏的结局、总体并发症、手术时间。使用 Stata 13.1 软件进行数据合成和统计分析。

结果

共分析了 8 项随机对照试验,共纳入 791 例患者(453 例病例和 338 例对照)。与不进行加固相比,加固吻合口与吻合口出血风险降低相关(RR=0.609,95%CI=0.439-0.846,P=0.003)和总体并发症(RR=0.673,95%CI=0.507-0.892,P=0.006)。术后漏的风险无显著差异(RR=0.654,95%CI=0.275-1.555,P=0.337)。吻合口缝合需要更长的手术时间(WMD=13.211,95%CI=6.192-20.229,P=0.000)。

结论

使用支撑或覆盖材料加固吻合口可以减少吻合口出血和总体并发症。但没有发现吻合口缝合的明显优势,且手术时间更长。加固后吻合口漏的发生率没有明显降低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验