de Medeiros Raquel Correia, Sigua Eder Alberto, Navarro Pablo, Olate Sergio, Albergaria Barbosa Jose Ricardo
Postgraduate PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Postgraduate PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;74(4):778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
To evaluate in vitro resistance of 5 techniques of internal fixation of bilateral fractures involving the mandibular angle and body.
Twenty-five polyurethane mandibles were used as substrates, fixed with a 2-mm fixation system, and divided into 5 groups: I, 1 4-hole plate, without intermediate space, in the neutral zone of the mandibular body and another similar plate in the external oblique ridge of the contralateral mandibular angle; II, 1 6-hole plate, with intermediate space, in the neutral zone of the mandibular body and a similar plate in the external oblique ridge of the left mandibular angle; III, 1 4-hole locking plate, with intermediate space, in the right neutral zone and another similar plate in the left external oblique ridge; IV, 2 4-hole plates, with intermediate space, one in the tension zone and the other in the compression zone of the mandibular body, and 1 4-hole plate, with intermediate space, in the external oblique ridge of the contralateral mandibular angle; V, 2 4-hole plates with intermediate space, one in the tension zone and the other in the compression zone of the mandibular body and similarly in the buccal side of the left mandibular angle. Mandibles were subjected to vertical linear load tests by a mechanical testing machine (Instron 4411, Instron Corp, Norwood, MA) to record peak load and load for displacements of 3, 5, and 7 mm.
Group I had the least mechanical resistance of all groups, regardless of displacement, and group IV had the greatest mechanical resistance. Among groups II, III, and V, there was no statistically meaningful difference.
Fixation of bilateral mandibular fractures involving the mandibular angle and body using 2 plates in the region of the body and 1 plate in the tension zone in the region of the mandibular angle was the technique that presented the best mechanical resistance.
评估下颌角和下颌体双侧骨折的5种内固定技术的体外抗阻力。
25个聚氨酯下颌骨用作基质,采用2毫米固定系统固定,并分为5组:I组,1个4孔钢板,无中间间隙,位于下颌体中性区,对侧下颌角外斜线处有另一个类似钢板;II组,1个6孔钢板,有中间间隙,位于下颌体中性区,左侧下颌角外斜线处有一个类似钢板;III组,1个4孔锁定钢板,有中间间隙,位于右侧中性区,左侧外斜线处有另一个类似钢板;IV组,2个4孔钢板,有中间间隙,一个位于下颌体张力区,另一个位于下颌体压缩区,对侧下颌角外斜线处有1个4孔钢板,有中间间隙;V组,2个4孔钢板,有中间间隙,一个位于下颌体张力区,另一个位于下颌体压缩区,左侧下颌角颊侧情况类似。通过机械试验机(Instron 4411,英斯特朗公司,马萨诸塞州诺伍德)对下颌骨进行垂直线性载荷测试,记录峰值载荷以及位移为3、5和7毫米时的载荷。
无论位移如何,I组在所有组中机械抗阻力最小,IV组机械抗阻力最大。II、III和V组之间无统计学意义上的差异。
在下颌体区域使用2块钢板且在下颌角区域的张力区使用1块钢板固定下颌角和下颌体双侧骨折,是机械抗阻力最佳的技术。