• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锁定钢板与非锁定钢板治疗下颌骨骨折时咬合力的比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparison of Bite Force with Locking Plates versus Non-Locking Plates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Glória José Cristiano Ramos, Fernandes Ighor Andrade, Silveira Esmeralda Maria da, Souza Glaciele Maria de, Rocha Ricardo Lopes, Galvão Endi Lanza, Falci Saulo Gabriel Moreira

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, MG, Brazil.

Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;22(2):181-189. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604056. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1604056
PMID:29619110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5882372/
Abstract

Mandibular fractures represent a high percentage of all facial fractures, and the bite force is a fundamental parameter to measure the actual mandibular function and, subsequently, the masticatory efficiency and quality of life.  The purpose of the present systematic review was to verify if there is any difference in the bite forces of patients with mandibular fractures fixed by locking or non-locking plates, testing the null hypothesis of no difference in this parameter.  A systematic review of the literature was conducted using four databases (PubMed, Virtual Health Library, Web of Science and Science Direct) without restrictions as to publication date or language. We found 3,039 abstracts, and selected 4 articles for this review.  The overall results show better performance in bite force for the locking plates when compared with the non-locking plates in the incisor region (mean deviation [MD]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.13-2.23), right molar region (MD: 4.71; 95%CI: 0.63-8.79) and left molar region (MD: 10.34; 95%CI: 4.55-16.13). Although the results of this study indicated a better bite force result with the locking plates, there is still no sufficient evidence to support this information safely.

摘要

下颌骨骨折在所有面部骨折中占比很高,咬合力是衡量下颌骨实际功能的一个基本参数,进而也是衡量咀嚼效率和生活质量的参数。本系统评价的目的是验证采用锁定钢板或非锁定钢板固定的下颌骨骨折患者在咬合力方面是否存在差异,检验该参数无差异的零假设。使用四个数据库(PubMed、虚拟健康图书馆、科学引文索引和科学Direct)对文献进行了系统评价,对出版日期或语言没有限制。我们找到了3039篇摘要,并为本评价选择了4篇文章。总体结果显示,与非锁定钢板相比,锁定钢板在切牙区(平均差值[MD]:1.18;95%置信区间[95%CI]:0.13 - 2.23)、右侧磨牙区(MD:4.71;95%CI:0.63 - 8.79)和左侧磨牙区(MD:10.34;95%CI:4.55 - 16.13)的咬合力表现更好。尽管本研究结果表明锁定钢板的咬合力结果更好,但仍然没有足够的证据安全地支持这一信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/79eec3ae43ab/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/7a4b8a572bce/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/2f8ee99138f0/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/487a3092646a/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/892150395eb2/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/79eec3ae43ab/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/7a4b8a572bce/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/2f8ee99138f0/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/487a3092646a/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/892150395eb2/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca4c/5882372/79eec3ae43ab/10-1055-s-0037-1604056-i170650sr-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Bite Force with Locking Plates versus Non-Locking Plates in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.锁定钢板与非锁定钢板治疗下颌骨骨折时咬合力的比较:一项荟萃分析
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;22(2):181-189. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604056. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.比较2毫米锁定钢板与2毫米标准钢板治疗下颌骨骨折时咬合力的前瞻性随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):1995-2000. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.014. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
3
Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture.使用2.0毫米传统微型钢板与2.0毫米锁定钢板治疗下颌骨骨折患者的咬合力评估
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Mar;9(1):62-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563697. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.传统接骨板系统与锁定接骨板系统在下颌骨骨折中的咬合力评估
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):972-8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0764-7. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
5
Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.2.0接骨板固定萎缩性下颌骨骨折生物力学稳定性的比较有限元分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;71(2):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.09.019.
6
Comparative evaluation of bite forces in patients after treatment of mandibular fractures with miniplate osteosynthesis and internal locking miniplate osteosynthesis.小型接骨板骨合成术与内锁式小型接骨板骨合成术治疗下颌骨骨折患者后的咬合力比较评估
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 Nov;4(Suppl 1):S26-31. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.144575.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Bite Force in Mandible Fractures Treated with Three-Dimensional Curved Locking Strut Plate Versus Straight Locking Miniplate.三维弯曲锁定支撑钢板与直形锁定微型钢板治疗下颌骨骨折的咀嚼咬合力比较评估
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):1006-1021. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01996-3. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.微型钢板和小型钢板治疗下颌骨骨折后的咬合力评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1903-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.036. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
9
Comparative evaluation of bite force analytical study following mandibular osteosysthesis using three-dimensional and conventional locking miniplates.使用三维锁定微型钢板和传统锁定微型钢板对下颌骨骨生成术后咬合力的比较评估分析研究
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan-Jun;8(1):34-40. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_76_16.
10
Locking Miniplate Osteosynthesis of Anterior Mandibular Fractures-Quo Vadis?下颌骨前部骨折的锁定微型钢板接骨术——何去何从?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 May;77(5):1041.e1-1041.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of accuracy of three-dimensional printing and three-dimensional miniplates in treatment of anterior mandibular fractures: a prospective clinical study.三维打印及三维微型钛板在下颌前部骨折治疗中的准确性评估:一项前瞻性临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05935-1.
2
Is "Bite force" a reliable parameter to compare masticatory efficiency restoration following ORIF of anterior mandibular fractures?“咬合力”是否是比较下颌前部骨折切开复位内固定术后咀嚼效率恢复情况的可靠参数?
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 Nov-Dec;12(6):777-781. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Masticatory Function and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Partial Maxillectomy Patients.部分上颌骨切除患者咀嚼功能与口腔健康相关生活质量的关联
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Nov/Dec;29(6):561-564. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4852.
2
Facial Fractures: Large Epidemiologic Survey in Northern Brazil Reveals Some Unique Characteristics.面部骨折:巴西北部的大型流行病学调查揭示了一些独特特征。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;74(12):2480.e1-2480.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
3
Prevalence, pattern, etiology, and management of maxillofacial trauma in a developing country: a retrospective study.
The effect of two phosphodiesterase inhibitors on bone healing in mandibular fractures (animal study in rats).
两种磷酸二酯酶抑制剂对下颌骨骨折愈合的影响(大鼠动物研究)
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug 31;46(4):258-265. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.4.258.
发展中国家颌面部创伤的患病率、模式、病因及管理:一项回顾性研究
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Aug;42(4):174-81. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.4.174. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
Evaluation of the effect of different mandibular fractures on the temporomandibular joint using magnetic resonance imaging: five years of follow-up.使用磁共振成像评估不同下颌骨骨折对颞下颌关节的影响:五年随访
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Nov;45(11):1495-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 26.
5
Maxillofacial fractures among Sudanese children at Khartoum Dental Teaching Hospital.喀土穆牙科教学医院收治的苏丹儿童颌面部骨折情况
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 23;9:120. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1934-5.
6
Assessment of Bite Force in Patients Treated with 2.0-mm Traditional Miniplates versus 2.0-mm Locking Plates for Mandibular Fracture.使用2.0毫米传统微型钢板与2.0毫米锁定钢板治疗下颌骨骨折患者的咬合力评估
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Mar;9(1):62-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563697. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Impact of trauma and surgical treatment on the quality of life of patients with facial fractures.创伤及外科治疗对面部骨折患者生活质量的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 May;45(5):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.022. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
8
In Vitro Mechanical Analysis of Different Techniques of Internal Fixation of Combined Mandibular Angle and Body Fractures.下颌角与体部联合骨折不同内固定技术的体外力学分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;74(4):778-85. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
9
Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.传统接骨板系统与锁定接骨板系统在下颌骨骨折中的咬合力评估
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Dec;14(4):972-8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0764-7. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
10
Development of a Titanium Plate for Mandibular Angle Fractures with a Bone Defect in the Lower Border: Finite Element Analysis and Mechanical Test.一种用于下颌角骨折伴下颌下缘骨缺损的钛板的研制:有限元分析与力学测试
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2015 Jun 30;6(3):e5. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2015.6305. eCollection 2015 Jul-Sep.