Suppr超能文献

心胸外科手术后非呼吸机相关性重症监护病房获得性肺炎:诊断工具的准确性及预后

Non-Ventilator ICU-Acquired Pneumonia After Cardiothoracic Surgery: Accuracy of Diagnostic Tools and Outcomes.

作者信息

Stéphan François, Zarrouki Youssef, Mougeot Christine, Imbert Audrey, Kortchinsky Talna, Pilorge Catherine, Rézaiguia-Delclaux Saida

机构信息

Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit

Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2016 Mar;61(3):324-32. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04059. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia after cardiothoracic surgery is challenging to diagnose, and little is known about its impact on patient outcomes. Here, our primary objective was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of cultures of 2 types of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) specimens: endotracheal aspirates (FOB-EA) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (FOB-BAL). The secondary objectives were to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of spontaneous sputum cultures and of the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) and to describe patient outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of consecutive cardiothoracic surgery subjects with suspected non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. Using FOB-BAL cultures ≥10(4) cfu/mL as the reference standard, we evaluated the accuracy of FOB-EA ≥10(5) cfu/mL and spontaneous sputum ≥10(7) cfu/mL. On the day of FOB, we determined the modified CPIS. Mortality and antibiotic treatments were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 105 subjects, 57 (54.3%) received a diagnosis of non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. FOB-EA cultures had 82% (95% CI 69-91%) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI 89-100%) specificity and were significantly less sensitive than FOB-BAL cultures (P < .004). Spontaneous sputum was obtained from one-third of subjects. Spontaneous sputum cultures had 82% (95% CI 56-95%) sensitivity and 94% (95% CI 68-100%) specificity and were non-significantly less sensitive than FOB-BAL (P = .061). A modified CPIS >6 had 42% (95% CI 29-56%) sensitivity and 87% (95% CI 74-95%) specificity for non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. Antibiotic therapy was stopped in all subjects without non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia, after 1.6 ± 1.2 d, without deleterious effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified CPIS has low diagnostic accuracy for non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. FOB-EA cultures perform less well than do FOB-BAL cultures for diagnosing non-ventilator ICU-acquired pneumonia. Spontaneous sputum is valuable when FOB cannot be performed but could be obtained in only a minority of subjects. When cultures are negative, antibiotic discontinuation is safe.

摘要

背景

心胸外科手术后非机械通气的重症监护病房获得性肺炎的诊断具有挑战性,其对患者预后的影响鲜为人知。在此,我们的主要目标是比较两种纤维支气管镜(FOB)标本培养物的敏感性和特异性:气管内吸出物(FOB-EA)和支气管肺泡灌洗 fluid(FOB-BAL)。次要目标是评估自发痰培养物和改良临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)的敏感性和特异性,并描述患者的预后。

方法

我们对连续的疑似非机械通气重症监护病房获得性肺炎的心胸外科手术患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。以FOB-BAL培养物≥10(4) cfu/mL作为参考标准,我们评估了FOB-EA≥10(5) cfu/mL和自发痰≥10(7) cfu/mL的准确性。在进行FOB的当天,我们确定了改良的CPIS。记录死亡率和抗生素治疗情况。

结果

在105名患者中,57名(54.3%)被诊断为非机械通气重症监护病房获得性肺炎。FOB-EA培养物的敏感性为82%(95%CI 69-91%),特异性为100%(95%CI 89-100%),其敏感性显著低于FOB-BAL培养物(P <.004)。三分之一的患者获得了自发痰。自发痰培养物的敏感性为82%(95%CI 56-95%),特异性为94%(95%CI 68-100%),其敏感性低于FOB-BAL但差异无统计学意义(P =.061)。改良CPIS>6对非机械通气重症监护病房获得性肺炎的敏感性为42%(95%CI 29-56%),特异性为87%(95%CI 74-95%)。所有未患非机械通气重症监护病房获得性肺炎的患者在1.6±1.2天后停用抗生素,且无有害影响。

结论

改良CPIS对非机械通气重症监护病房获得性肺炎的诊断准确性较低。在诊断非机械通气重症监护病房获得性肺炎方面,FOB-EA培养物的表现不如FOB-BAL培养物。当无法进行FOB时,自发痰很有价值,但只有少数患者能够获得。当培养结果为阴性时,停用抗生素是安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验