Mangi Asif Muhammad, Bansal Vikas, Li Guangxi, Pieper Matthew S, Gajic Ognjen, Festic Emir
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN.
Acta Med Acad. 2015;44(2):109-16. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.138.
Inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled beta agonists were shown to decrease the lung injury in animal models. We investigated the association of pre-hospital use of inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled beta agonists with the incidence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in a population based cohort of hospitalized patients.
Retrospective cohort study of adult patients from Olmsted County, Minnesota admitted to the hospital with at least one predisposing condition for ARDS from 2001-2008. The association with pre-hospital use of inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled beta agonists was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Primary outcome was ARDS and secondary outcome was hospital mortality.
Out of 2429 hospitalized adult patients with at least one risk factor for ARDS, 10.5% of those taking and 14% of those not taking inhaled corticosteroids developed ARDS (OR 0.72; 0.53-0.97; p<0.03). Inhaled beta agonists showed similar unadjusted protective effect; 9.7% of users and 14.4% of non-users developed ARDS (OR 0.64; 0.48-0.86; p=0.003). After adjusting for risk factors, comorbidities and severity of illness in the multiple logistic regression model, use of inhaled beta agonists, but not inhaled corticosteroids, remained independently associated with decreased risk of ARDS (OR 0.48; 0.31-0.72; p<0.001 versus 0.87; 0.57-1.29; p=0.49). The estimated protective effects were more pronounced among patients with pneumonia compared to those without pneumonia.
Prehospital use of inhaled beta agonists but not inhaled corticosteroids was significantly associated with decreased incidence of ARDS among hospitalized patients at risk, once adjusted for baseline characteristics, predisposing and comorbid conditions, as well as severity of illness.
在动物模型中,吸入性糖皮质激素和吸入性β受体激动剂已被证明可减轻肺损伤。我们在一个以住院患者为基础的队列中,研究了院前使用吸入性糖皮质激素和吸入性β受体激动剂与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发病率之间的关联。
对2001年至2008年明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县因至少一种ARDS易患因素而入院的成年患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用单因素和多因素分析评估与院前使用吸入性糖皮质激素和吸入性β受体激动剂的关联。主要结局是ARDS,次要结局是医院死亡率。
在2429例因至少一种ARDS风险因素而住院的成年患者中,使用吸入性糖皮质激素的患者中有10.5%发生ARDS,未使用的患者中有14%发生ARDS(比值比[OR]0.72;95%置信区间[CI]0.53 - 0.97;p<0.03)。吸入性β受体激动剂显示出类似的未调整保护作用;使用者中有9.7%发生ARDS,非使用者中有14.4%发生ARDS(OR 0.64;95%CI 0.48 - 0.86;p = 0.003)。在多因素逻辑回归模型中对风险因素、合并症和疾病严重程度进行调整后,吸入性β受体激动剂的使用与ARDS风险降低独立相关(OR 0.48;95%CI 0.31 - 0.72;p<0.001,而吸入性糖皮质激素为0.87;95%CI 0.57 - 1.29;p = 0.49)。与无肺炎患者相比,估计的保护作用在肺炎患者中更为明显。
在对基线特征、易患因素、合并症以及疾病严重程度进行调整后,院前使用吸入性β受体激动剂而非吸入性糖皮质激素与有风险的住院患者中ARDS发病率降低显著相关。