Ferrer Miquel, Difrancesco Leonardo Filippo, Liapikou Adamantia, Rinaudo Mariano, Carbonara Marco, Li Bassi Gianluigi, Gabarrus Albert, Torres Antoni
Department of Pneumology, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Crit Care. 2015 Dec 23;19:450. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1165-5.
Microbial aetiology of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia (ICUAP) determines antibiotic treatment and outcomes. The impact of polymicrobial ICUAP is not extensively known. We therefore investigated the characteristics and outcomes of polymicrobial aetiology of ICUAP.
Patients with ICUAP confirmed microbiologically were prospectively compared according to identification of 1 (monomicrobial) or more (polymicrobial) potentially-pathogenic microorganisms. Microbes usually considered as non-pathogenic were not considered for the etiologic diagnosis. We assessed clinical characteristics, microbiology, inflammatory biomarkers and outcome variables.
Among 441 consecutive patients with ICUAP, 256 (58%) had microbiologic confirmation, and 41 (16%) of them polymicrobial pneumonia. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, and several Enterobacteriaceae were more frequent in polymicrobial pneumonia. Multi-drug and extensive-drug resistance was similarly frequent in both groups. Compared with monomicrobial, patients with polymicrobial pneumonia had less frequently chronic heart disease (6, 15% vs. 71, 33%, p = 0.019), and more frequently pleural effusion (18, 50%, vs. 54, 25%, p = 0.008), without any other significant difference. Appropriate empiric antimicrobial treatment was similarly frequent in the monomicrobial (185, 86%) and the polymicrobial group (39, 95%), as were the initial response to the empiric treatment, length of stay and mortality. Systemic inflammatory response was similar comparing monomicrobial with polymicrobial ICUAP.
The aetiology of ICUAP confirmed microbiologically was polymicrobial in 16% cases. Pleural effusion and absence of chronic heart disease are associated with polymicrobial pneumonia. When empiric treatment is frequently appropriate, polymicrobial aetiology does not influence the outcome of ICUAP.
重症监护病房(ICU)获得性肺炎(ICUAP)的微生物病因决定了抗生素治疗及预后。多重微生物所致ICUAP的影响尚未被广泛了解。因此,我们调查了多重微生物病因所致ICUAP的特征及预后。
对微生物学确诊的ICUAP患者,根据是否鉴定出1种(单一微生物)或更多(多重微生物)潜在致病微生物进行前瞻性比较。病因诊断不考虑通常被视为非致病性的微生物。我们评估了临床特征、微生物学、炎症生物标志物及预后变量。
在441例连续的ICUAP患者中,256例(58%)微生物学确诊,其中41例(16%)为多重微生物肺炎。甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌、流感嗜血杆菌及几种肠杆菌科细菌在多重微生物肺炎中更常见。两组的多重耐药和广泛耐药情况相似。与单一微生物肺炎患者相比,多重微生物肺炎患者患慢性心脏病的频率较低(6例,15%对71例,33%,p = 0.019),胸腔积液的频率较高(18例,50%对54例,25%,p = 0.008),无其他显著差异。单一微生物组(185例,86%)和多重微生物组(39例,95%)接受适当经验性抗菌治疗的频率相似,经验性治疗的初始反应、住院时间及死亡率也相似。单一微生物与多重微生物所致ICUAP相比,全身炎症反应相似。
微生物学确诊的ICUAP病因中,16%为多重微生物。胸腔积液及无慢性心脏病与多重微生物肺炎相关。当经验性治疗通常合适时,多重微生物病因不影响ICUAP的预后。